<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acts 29 vs. the SBC (One Year Later)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/</link>
	<description>Southern Baptist News &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark DeVine</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>I led First Calvary Baptist Church in Kansas City, an urban congregation, 160 years old and formerly in decline, to merge with the The Journey, the church Darrin Patrick pastors in St. Louis. The Journey deployed church planter Kevin Cawley to re-plant First Calvary as Redeemer Fellowship. The church has tripled in size now. They preach the gospel, reach out to the poor, are theologically solid and have my utter admiration.

Yes, these younger ACTS29 leaders could probably learn a few things from us older SBC types, but these guys brings much to the table that the SBC needs as well. Too many have hastily and wrongly lumped people like Darrin Patrick and other ACTS29 pastors in with streams of the emerging church movement  that despize doctrine, distort the gospel, and have a bad conscience for proselytizing. Big mistake. Some of these guys bring togehter a truly exciting combination of deep commitment to the Bible, advance of the gospel and church planting among some of the most resistant population groups in North America. We ought to be supporting them and thanking God for raising them up among us. And some of are. 

At the State Convention following the implementation of the restriction against ACTS29 in Missouri, voters overwhelmingly rejected the slate of officers associated with the anti-ACTS29 group. Good for Missouri Baptists. I pray that the sanity continues there.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mark DeVines last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theologyprof.com/how-big-is-the-emerging-church/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How Big is the Emerging Church?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I led First Calvary Baptist Church in Kansas City, an urban congregation, 160 years old and formerly in decline, to merge with the The Journey, the church Darrin Patrick pastors in St. Louis. The Journey deployed church planter Kevin Cawley to re-plant First Calvary as Redeemer Fellowship. The church has tripled in size now. They preach the gospel, reach out to the poor, are theologically solid and have my utter admiration.</p>
<p>Yes, these younger ACTS29 leaders could probably learn a few things from us older SBC types, but these guys brings much to the table that the SBC needs as well. Too many have hastily and wrongly lumped people like Darrin Patrick and other ACTS29 pastors in with streams of the emerging church movement  that despize doctrine, distort the gospel, and have a bad conscience for proselytizing. Big mistake. Some of these guys bring togehter a truly exciting combination of deep commitment to the Bible, advance of the gospel and church planting among some of the most resistant population groups in North America. We ought to be supporting them and thanking God for raising them up among us. And some of are. </p>
<p>At the State Convention following the implementation of the restriction against ACTS29 in Missouri, voters overwhelmingly rejected the slate of officers associated with the anti-ACTS29 group. Good for Missouri Baptists. I pray that the sanity continues there.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Mark DeVines last blog post..<a href="http://www.theologyprof.com/how-big-is-the-emerging-church/" rel="nofollow">How Big is the Emerging Church?</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Svoboda</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Svoboda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Todd,

Great last word.  I am also looking into urban church planting and would like very much to be able to plant with the SBC and Acts 29.  I hold the same position as you when it comes to drinking and I think it is crazy that this issue causes the tension that is did/does between Acts 29 and the SBC... 

I love both the SBC and Acts 29 and I surely hope that I am able to participate with both when it comes time for me to church plant.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Matt Svobodas last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://evangelicalvillage.com/2009/01/26/velvet-elvis-preaching-and-teaching-part-6/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How Does Rob Bell Approach Preaching and Teaching?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>Great last word.  I am also looking into urban church planting and would like very much to be able to plant with the SBC and Acts 29.  I hold the same position as you when it comes to drinking and I think it is crazy that this issue causes the tension that is did/does between Acts 29 and the SBC&#8230; </p>
<p>I love both the SBC and Acts 29 and I surely hope that I am able to participate with both when it comes time for me to church plant.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Matt Svobodas last blog post..<a href="http://evangelicalvillage.com/2009/01/26/velvet-elvis-preaching-and-teaching-part-6/" rel="nofollow">How Does Rob Bell Approach Preaching and Teaching?</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Burus</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Burus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>I want to share with you guys where my heart is in writing this piece.  I am a 23 year old Southern Baptist who over the last year and a half has been moving towards a call into urban church planting and pastoring.  During this time I have prayerfully considered the options on how to go about fulfilling such a task.  My conclusion has been to first, go to seminary to receive further training in the Word and practical matters, and second, to try and hook into the SBC for assistance in getting a plant started (through a program such as The Nehemiah Project or what not).  I think trying to plant with the SBC is a wonderful option because of the years of experience they have in supporting works and the resources they have to back the people on the field.  That said, I have a strong gravitation towards Acts 29 because, missiologically and soteriologically, I feel closer to where they are, and so I would strongly consider trying to affiliate with them as well.  Therefore, I personally have a vested interest in seeing a good working relationship exist between the SBC and A29 if nothing for no other reason than my own selfishness in the plans I am pursuing.

And, just as a point of information, I do not believe abstinence is what the Bible portrays, nor is it particularly my conviction for myself, but it is something that I practice because of my current context (in the American South).

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Todd Buruss last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://toddongod.com/2009/01/24/contextualizing-is-not-a-dirty-word-surveying-contextualization-in-the-acts-of-the-apostles/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“Contextualizing” is Not a Dirty Word- Surveying Contextualization in the Acts of the Apostles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to share with you guys where my heart is in writing this piece.  I am a 23 year old Southern Baptist who over the last year and a half has been moving towards a call into urban church planting and pastoring.  During this time I have prayerfully considered the options on how to go about fulfilling such a task.  My conclusion has been to first, go to seminary to receive further training in the Word and practical matters, and second, to try and hook into the SBC for assistance in getting a plant started (through a program such as The Nehemiah Project or what not).  I think trying to plant with the SBC is a wonderful option because of the years of experience they have in supporting works and the resources they have to back the people on the field.  That said, I have a strong gravitation towards Acts 29 because, missiologically and soteriologically, I feel closer to where they are, and so I would strongly consider trying to affiliate with them as well.  Therefore, I personally have a vested interest in seeing a good working relationship exist between the SBC and A29 if nothing for no other reason than my own selfishness in the plans I am pursuing.</p>
<p>And, just as a point of information, I do not believe abstinence is what the Bible portrays, nor is it particularly my conviction for myself, but it is something that I practice because of my current context (in the American South).</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Todd Buruss last blog post..<a href="http://toddongod.com/2009/01/24/contextualizing-is-not-a-dirty-word-surveying-contextualization-in-the-acts-of-the-apostles/" rel="nofollow">“Contextualizing” is Not a Dirty Word- Surveying Contextualization in the Acts of the Apostles</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Wilton</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>Great article.  Thanks for the follow up.  We are planting Vintage Church with the LBC in New Orleans and we are currently in the candidate phase of becoming part of Acts 29.  Our experience with A29 has been great.

About the situation in MO: I have gotten to know Darrin Patrick (pastor of The Journey in St. Louis).  Before we decided to join up with A29, I talked with him about the controversy.  He admitted that there were some tough times but that he was encouraged about the future.  Darrin has great respect for the SBC and has no desire to leave.  He encouraged us to stay with the LBC and join up with the network.

About the A29 movement: A29 has no desire to be a denomination. Driscoll reiterated in Dallas last fall about the fact that they are a network and a movement.  When I have received any resistance by my SBC friends for partnering with A29, all I had to tell them was that A29 is extremely similar to the &quot;Purpose-Driven Movement&quot; in function and purpose.  This has helped a lot of my older-generational friends.  A29 desires for each partnering church to not only sustain their denominational identity, but to also respect and follow their rules and convictions.  Do most of the A29 churches endorse the freedom to drink alcohol? Of course.  However, A29 encourages those planters who are planting through a denomination that is against this freedom to abide by those rules and regulations.  Here is the official response by A29 at the end of their Alcohol statement online:
&quot;In conclusion, there are different views on alcohol in our network and even on our board. We recognize that this is an issue where Christians can and do disagree, so we have no position on alcohol other than that people should have their conscience captive to the word of God, submit to the leadership of their church or denomination, and do everything for God&#039;s glory.&quot;

My conclusion:  I am not burdened by this battle, but by the fact that the SBC is a dying denomination that needs a major reformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.  This is no secret.  Even the most hardcore old-schoolers would agree with this.  Something radical has to be done.  Instead of attacking a Bible-based Network that is making an strong impact around the world, we should be focusing on the fact that our own churches are failing in making an impact.  Our church pursued partnership with A29 because we have a desire to grow a vibrant church in the heart of New Orleans that is making disciples.  In an urban context, these guys are the leading voice.  We would have loved to learn from an SBC entity or church, but I am not aware of any that provide the brotherhood and resource (in particular for Urban Church Planting)  I would love to hear any recommendations within the SBC circles.

To my fellow young SBC church planters...don&#039;t jump ship.  The theological, cooperative, and missional conviction of the SBC is solid.  There is a great need for a reformation.  We can&#039;t do anything about those who resist change and create conflict over things that don&#039;t really matter.  Focus on planting a church that glorifies God.  Focus on reaching the least and the lost.  Trust me, nothing speaks louder than the transformation of a community by the Gospel.  Launch your church, seek out Godly counsel from the SBC and other Biblical entities, evangelize your community, and then have a rocking baptism celebration.  Reality is...even if you baptize 5 people it will probably be more baptisms than most of the churches in your association in years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Thanks for the follow up.  We are planting Vintage Church with the LBC in New Orleans and we are currently in the candidate phase of becoming part of Acts 29.  Our experience with A29 has been great.</p>
<p>About the situation in MO: I have gotten to know Darrin Patrick (pastor of The Journey in St. Louis).  Before we decided to join up with A29, I talked with him about the controversy.  He admitted that there were some tough times but that he was encouraged about the future.  Darrin has great respect for the SBC and has no desire to leave.  He encouraged us to stay with the LBC and join up with the network.</p>
<p>About the A29 movement: A29 has no desire to be a denomination. Driscoll reiterated in Dallas last fall about the fact that they are a network and a movement.  When I have received any resistance by my SBC friends for partnering with A29, all I had to tell them was that A29 is extremely similar to the &#8220;Purpose-Driven Movement&#8221; in function and purpose.  This has helped a lot of my older-generational friends.  A29 desires for each partnering church to not only sustain their denominational identity, but to also respect and follow their rules and convictions.  Do most of the A29 churches endorse the freedom to drink alcohol? Of course.  However, A29 encourages those planters who are planting through a denomination that is against this freedom to abide by those rules and regulations.  Here is the official response by A29 at the end of their Alcohol statement online:<br />
&#8220;In conclusion, there are different views on alcohol in our network and even on our board. We recognize that this is an issue where Christians can and do disagree, so we have no position on alcohol other than that people should have their conscience captive to the word of God, submit to the leadership of their church or denomination, and do everything for God&#8217;s glory.&#8221;</p>
<p>My conclusion:  I am not burdened by this battle, but by the fact that the SBC is a dying denomination that needs a major reformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.  This is no secret.  Even the most hardcore old-schoolers would agree with this.  Something radical has to be done.  Instead of attacking a Bible-based Network that is making an strong impact around the world, we should be focusing on the fact that our own churches are failing in making an impact.  Our church pursued partnership with A29 because we have a desire to grow a vibrant church in the heart of New Orleans that is making disciples.  In an urban context, these guys are the leading voice.  We would have loved to learn from an SBC entity or church, but I am not aware of any that provide the brotherhood and resource (in particular for Urban Church Planting)  I would love to hear any recommendations within the SBC circles.</p>
<p>To my fellow young SBC church planters&#8230;don&#8217;t jump ship.  The theological, cooperative, and missional conviction of the SBC is solid.  There is a great need for a reformation.  We can&#8217;t do anything about those who resist change and create conflict over things that don&#8217;t really matter.  Focus on planting a church that glorifies God.  Focus on reaching the least and the lost.  Trust me, nothing speaks louder than the transformation of a community by the Gospel.  Launch your church, seek out Godly counsel from the SBC and other Biblical entities, evangelize your community, and then have a rocking baptism celebration.  Reality is&#8230;even if you baptize 5 people it will probably be more baptisms than most of the churches in your association in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Thomas</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>I am currently in the great state of Missouri visiting a few of our Acts 29 churches--one of whom is SBC. We just had a 45 minute conversation about this apparent ongoing issue. This teetotaling pastor&#039;s concern was that pastors are being forced to choose which organization to affiliate in spite of the BF&amp;M statement that allows cooperation (Article XIV) and promotes autonomy of the local church (Article VI).

Acts 29 does not serve as an authority over any church and allows its local leadership to determine how it regulates matters of christian liberty.

We love our SBC brothers and their passion for missions. We would be encouraged to continue to cooperate with one another in carrying forward the missionary, educational, and benevolent ministries for the extension of Christ&#039;s Kingdom.

Scott Thomas
Acts 29 Director

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Scott Thomass last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acts29network.org/acts-29-blog/puritan-porn--church-planting-fever-part-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Puritan Porn &amp; Church Planting Fever, part 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently in the great state of Missouri visiting a few of our Acts 29 churches&#8211;one of whom is SBC. We just had a 45 minute conversation about this apparent ongoing issue. This teetotaling pastor&#8217;s concern was that pastors are being forced to choose which organization to affiliate in spite of the BF&amp;M statement that allows cooperation (Article XIV) and promotes autonomy of the local church (Article VI).</p>
<p>Acts 29 does not serve as an authority over any church and allows its local leadership to determine how it regulates matters of christian liberty.</p>
<p>We love our SBC brothers and their passion for missions. We would be encouraged to continue to cooperate with one another in carrying forward the missionary, educational, and benevolent ministries for the extension of Christ&#8217;s Kingdom.</p>
<p>Scott Thomas<br />
Acts 29 Director</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Scott Thomass last blog post..<a href="http://www.acts29network.org/acts-29-blog/puritan-porn--church-planting-fever-part-3/" rel="nofollow">Puritan Porn &amp; Church Planting Fever, part 3</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Acts 29 doesn&#039;t require their plants to have beer parties; they just--like the vast majority of American evangelicals--don&#039;t have laws against moderate drinking. It seems clear to me the MBC was just embarrassed by the news story, probably received angry calls from prominent MBC members, and had to act. A complete disassociation with Acts 29 is immature and legalistic. 

By the way, LifeWay Christian Stores will sell you a copy of &quot;The Shack,&quot; even though it teaches the Bible  and the Church are untrustworthy and corrupted. But, LifeWay has rules against alcohol. The SBC really has some screwed up priorities. 

When I was attending NOBTS, I wrote a paper describing why the SBC prohibition on alcohol was wrong. I got an A on the paper but was also told by a few professors that unless I changed my mind, finding a job in an SBC church would be very difficult. I never found out how difficult it would have been though because I earned my doctorate at a state university and went into academia. 

my old paper:  http://www.brucesabin.com/alcohol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acts 29 doesn&#8217;t require their plants to have beer parties; they just&#8211;like the vast majority of American evangelicals&#8211;don&#8217;t have laws against moderate drinking. It seems clear to me the MBC was just embarrassed by the news story, probably received angry calls from prominent MBC members, and had to act. A complete disassociation with Acts 29 is immature and legalistic. </p>
<p>By the way, LifeWay Christian Stores will sell you a copy of &#8220;The Shack,&#8221; even though it teaches the Bible  and the Church are untrustworthy and corrupted. But, LifeWay has rules against alcohol. The SBC really has some screwed up priorities. </p>
<p>When I was attending NOBTS, I wrote a paper describing why the SBC prohibition on alcohol was wrong. I got an A on the paper but was also told by a few professors that unless I changed my mind, finding a job in an SBC church would be very difficult. I never found out how difficult it would have been though because I earned my doctorate at a state university and went into academia. </p>
<p>my old paper:  <a href="http://www.brucesabin.com/alcohol" rel="nofollow">http://www.brucesabin.com/alcohol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>it should not have been a big deal to start with. thanks.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;andrews last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Tallskinnykiwi/~3/520860042/missional-church-ala-1955.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Missional Church ala 1955&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it should not have been a big deal to start with. thanks.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>andrews last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Tallskinnykiwi/~3/520860042/missional-church-ala-1955.html" rel="nofollow">Missional Church ala 1955</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Hobbs</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>To John 3:16, 
Thanks for a perfect illustration of everything that was and is wrong with the fundamentalist movement in the SBC.  Anyone or any church that doesn&#039;t work from your pre-approved list of rules certainly can&#039;t be &#039;Bible-believing&#039;.  Please stop, you&#039;re embarrassing us.  

Signed,
A non-alcohol drinking, conservative, inerrantist, suit-wearing (On Sunday morning, anyway), traditional SBC church pastor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To John 3:16,<br />
Thanks for a perfect illustration of everything that was and is wrong with the fundamentalist movement in the SBC.  Anyone or any church that doesn&#8217;t work from your pre-approved list of rules certainly can&#8217;t be &#8216;Bible-believing&#8217;.  Please stop, you&#8217;re embarrassing us.  </p>
<p>Signed,<br />
A non-alcohol drinking, conservative, inerrantist, suit-wearing (On Sunday morning, anyway), traditional SBC church pastor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John 3:16</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>John 3:16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is not a call to antinomian Christian liberty&quot; is the most disingenuous claim made in this little blog. Be honest, sir. From the perspective of the Bible-believing churches of the SBC, you have issued a call to antinomian Christian liberty reminiscent of calls made by liberals in yesteryear and by the emergent church and Calvinists today. This raises the issue of how or where you learned to (mis)read the Bible such that one can be culturally liberal yet theologically &quot;conservative&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is not a call to antinomian Christian liberty&#8221; is the most disingenuous claim made in this little blog. Be honest, sir. From the perspective of the Bible-believing churches of the SBC, you have issued a call to antinomian Christian liberty reminiscent of calls made by liberals in yesteryear and by the emergent church and Calvinists today. This raises the issue of how or where you learned to (mis)read the Bible such that one can be culturally liberal yet theologically &#8220;conservative&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Paul W. Foltz</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/acts-29-vs-the-sbc-one-year-later/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Paul W. Foltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=802#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>Greg Alford;
Excellent commentary and addum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Alford;<br />
Excellent commentary and addum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

