Comments on: 2009 SBC Voices BLOG MADNESS: Final

By: 2009 Blog Madness Champion | Southern Baptist Blogs - SBC Voices

2009 Blog Madness Champion | Southern Baptist Blogs - SBC Voices — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:38:01 +0000

[...] The final round was decisive, with iMonk taking 58% of the votes. But I also want to say thanks for all the referral traffic. This month has been another breakout for SBC voices and well worth the prize money. [...]

By: Jan Cundiff

Jan Cundiff — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:08:57 +0000

Hershael York is undoubtedly the most precious Christian alive and his opinions on the things of God are BIBLICAL and wise and worth hearing every time!

By: Sallie

Sallie — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:56:55 +0000

@iMonk ~ still laughing at "He recently nodded off during a business meeting." @everyone else ~ ya'll have too much time on yours hands...ROFL Sallies last blog post..Spring Gardening

By: Ragamuffin

Ragamuffin — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:23:45 +0000

Well, I hate that Chris decided to leave, because Leviticus 10 doesn't have anything to do with prayer beads either. And you'd have to stretch the meaning of chapter 18 so far out of whack to make it apply in any manner at all, you'd never be able to look a liberal Protestant in the face again and complain about them not taking Scripture seriously. Ragamuffins last blog post..Vain repetition

By: Tony Kummer

Tony Kummer — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:12:58 +0000

It was upside down and largely depended on who played along. I still think Beth Moore would have shocked everyone, but she didn’t link over.

By: Blake

Blake — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:10:37 +0000

I didn’t realize York and 9Marks were out in the first round last year and Reid and iMonk weren’t even in last year’s competition. The tables have certainly turned… or something. I wish Ed would have actually asked for votes on his blog. A showdown between Ed and iMonk would have been really cool.

By: Chris Poe

Chris Poe — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:53:02 +0000

ms, For someone who pointedly stated that he isn't interested in "the other side of this discussion" you just can't seem to stop. Or is it that interaction with the "other side" simply isn't desired on your blog? You are correct about the immediate context of Lev. 18, although I would argue that the underlying principle of Lev. 18:30 is not without wider applicability. However that's not a verse that I would have referenced in this discussion. Leviticus 10 would be a much more appropriate reference. But given your history of interaction with so called "neo reformed" bloggers over the past several years who are more knowledgeable and capable than I, I am skeptical that I can make any difference. Respond again if you must, but time constraints dictate that this be my last response. ecp Chris Poes last blog post..An Invitation