<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks for the TIP, but what&#8217;s the POINT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/</link>
	<description>Connecting Southern Baptist: 516 Blogs + 246 Twitter Accounts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alvin reid</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>alvin reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony. 
I think Dr. Akin just made the point. :-)

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;alvin reids last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alvinreid.com/archives/522&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amen to Akin-Axioms of a GCR&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony.<br />
I think Dr. Akin just made the point. <img src='http://sbcvoices.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>alvin reids last blog post..<a href="http://alvinreid.com/archives/522" rel="nofollow">Amen to Akin-Axioms of a GCR</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2640</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2640</guid>
		<description>Why put in the effort to fix the SBC when their are other great programs (like Acts29 for example) that are using money well and actively reaching the lost? I&#039;m not trying to be trite, this is a real question that I&#039;m trying to answer for myself

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;tims last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://expatriatemanifesto.blogspot.com/2009/04/dr-king-race-and-gospel.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dr. King, Race and the Gospel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why put in the effort to fix the SBC when their are other great programs (like Acts29 for example) that are using money well and actively reaching the lost? I&#8217;m not trying to be trite, this is a real question that I&#8217;m trying to answer for myself</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>tims last blog post..<a href="http://expatriatemanifesto.blogspot.com/2009/04/dr-king-race-and-gospel.html" rel="nofollow">Dr. King, Race and the Gospel</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olon Hyde</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>Olon Hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>Sallie,

I think you made some really great points.  

&lt;i&gt;&quot;We do have to change on many fronts but I think the most important part is getting our people trained properly as lay leaders who actually study the Word and know what they are talking about. 

For one, lifeway can stop trying to cram whole lessons of theology into one sunday school lesson. Why do we have to cover a topic in one week? Sometimes..oftentimes… a portion of scripture really needs a few weeks studying but yet we think someone knows it just because they had a sunday school lesson on it. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Your first point is absolutely spot on and as a pastor I speak this from my heart.  The greatest testimony to my ministry is first whether the church survives if I leave abrubtly (like dying for example) and second if the church remains healthy in my absence.  If those two things can take place without me, then I have done my job.  My job is not to do all the ministry of the church; my job is to equip the members to go out and do the ministry of the church.

As far as your second point, this is something we have to teach ourselves.  I have taught the discipleship class &lt;i&gt;Worship believers experiencing God&lt;/i&gt; two times now.  The problem with this study is it is designed for six weeks.  The first time I taught it, it took eight weeks (1 hour sessions).  The second time took 9 weeks.  So it takes &quot;ministers of education&quot; involved in the lives of the Sunday School teachers trainging them to better teach and that everyone is on the same page (for example, lets take two weeks on this lesson instead of one).

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Olon Hydes last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://notdrjekyll.blogspot.com/2009/04/looking-down-at-catholics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Looking Down at Catholics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sallie,</p>
<p>I think you made some really great points.  </p>
<p><i>&#8220;We do have to change on many fronts but I think the most important part is getting our people trained properly as lay leaders who actually study the Word and know what they are talking about. </p>
<p>For one, lifeway can stop trying to cram whole lessons of theology into one sunday school lesson. Why do we have to cover a topic in one week? Sometimes..oftentimes… a portion of scripture really needs a few weeks studying but yet we think someone knows it just because they had a sunday school lesson on it. &#8220;</i></p>
<p>Your first point is absolutely spot on and as a pastor I speak this from my heart.  The greatest testimony to my ministry is first whether the church survives if I leave abrubtly (like dying for example) and second if the church remains healthy in my absence.  If those two things can take place without me, then I have done my job.  My job is not to do all the ministry of the church; my job is to equip the members to go out and do the ministry of the church.</p>
<p>As far as your second point, this is something we have to teach ourselves.  I have taught the discipleship class <i>Worship believers experiencing God</i> two times now.  The problem with this study is it is designed for six weeks.  The first time I taught it, it took eight weeks (1 hour sessions).  The second time took 9 weeks.  So it takes &#8220;ministers of education&#8221; involved in the lives of the Sunday School teachers trainging them to better teach and that everyone is on the same page (for example, lets take two weeks on this lesson instead of one).</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Olon Hydes last blog post..<a href="http://notdrjekyll.blogspot.com/2009/04/looking-down-at-catholics.html" rel="nofollow">Looking Down at Catholics</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sallie</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sallie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2596</guid>
		<description>Sometimes it just seems like we have a bunch of people running around being the chief but not willing to be a servant leader. I heard a quote yesterday: &quot;We don&#039;t need a bunch of leaders serving... we need a bunch of servants leading.&quot; 

I think it fits a lot of our problems within the SBC. The problem we will always have with leaders serving is that they all think everything should be done their way and so will always be busy trying to make everyone conform to that rather than doing any actual serving.

We do have to change on many fronts but I think the most important part is getting our people trained properly as lay leaders who actually study the Word and know what they are talking about. 

For one, lifeway can stop trying to cram whole lessons of theology into one sunday school lesson. Why do we have to cover a topic in one week?  Sometimes..oftentimes... a portion of scripture really needs a few weeks studying but yet we think someone knows it just because they had a sunday school lesson on it. 

It&#039;s terrifying to me that we try and take our Savior to a lost and dying world but yet so many of us don&#039;t have the faith to believe that He can actually do anything for us. 

I&#039;m not sure we can change and make a difference but I&#039;d like to believe its possible. Changes, no matter what they are, though, won&#039;t make a difference if we don&#039;t know what we really believe and why.

In Christ,
Sallie

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sallies last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mikeandsallie.com/sallie/index.blog?entry_id=1364035&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Health and Healing Service&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it just seems like we have a bunch of people running around being the chief but not willing to be a servant leader. I heard a quote yesterday: &#8220;We don&#8217;t need a bunch of leaders serving&#8230; we need a bunch of servants leading.&#8221; </p>
<p>I think it fits a lot of our problems within the SBC. The problem we will always have with leaders serving is that they all think everything should be done their way and so will always be busy trying to make everyone conform to that rather than doing any actual serving.</p>
<p>We do have to change on many fronts but I think the most important part is getting our people trained properly as lay leaders who actually study the Word and know what they are talking about. </p>
<p>For one, lifeway can stop trying to cram whole lessons of theology into one sunday school lesson. Why do we have to cover a topic in one week?  Sometimes..oftentimes&#8230; a portion of scripture really needs a few weeks studying but yet we think someone knows it just because they had a sunday school lesson on it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s terrifying to me that we try and take our Savior to a lost and dying world but yet so many of us don&#8217;t have the faith to believe that He can actually do anything for us. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure we can change and make a difference but I&#8217;d like to believe its possible. Changes, no matter what they are, though, won&#8217;t make a difference if we don&#8217;t know what we really believe and why.</p>
<p>In Christ,<br />
Sallie</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Sallies last blog post..<a href="http://www.mikeandsallie.com/sallie/index.blog?entry_id=1364035" rel="nofollow">Health and Healing Service</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cross</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>I get what Dr. Reid is saying about adding without subtracting. I agree with him when it comes to the things that we do that are effective.  That position also makes sense on the level of not rocking the boat too much for those of us who are already in the SBC. It is easy to add stuff as long as you don&#039;t take things away that people are used to. Perhaps that is possible on many levels and it would take some time to think about what stays and what just has to go. But, the reason that many people want to start churches instead of transitioning existing churches is because people want to hold on to what they already have. Rarely do you see a situation where a church truly transitions to become effective missionally, although it does happen. I think that it would be very difficult with an organization the size of the SBC.

My concern when it comes to the SBC is that we string together half-measures that have some effectiveness in the short term but primarily satisfy the people that we already have who are giving to support the mission. We should not be the target group. Until we reposition ourselves to exist for God and others, a Great Commission Resurgence will be something that is done in name only and it will eventually fail. A true missional lifestyle means that we start as disciples of Christ. If we are a disciple of Jesus, our concern is not for ourselves.  Yes, keep what is effective and working. No doubt about that. But the willingness to see things differently and sacrifice our own lives must accompany any structural changes.

I have no doubt that Dr. Reid, Tony, and everyone here agrees with that. I just wanted to clarify that change for the sake of change is a dangerous as staying the same. A heart change, followed by structural change to assist the mission is what is required. I&#039;m praying for it.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Alan Crosss last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.downshoredrift.com/downshoredrift/2009/04/the-full-meaning-of-holiness-it-might-be-different-from-what-you-think.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Full Meaning of Holiness - It Might Be Different From What You Think&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what Dr. Reid is saying about adding without subtracting. I agree with him when it comes to the things that we do that are effective.  That position also makes sense on the level of not rocking the boat too much for those of us who are already in the SBC. It is easy to add stuff as long as you don&#8217;t take things away that people are used to. Perhaps that is possible on many levels and it would take some time to think about what stays and what just has to go. But, the reason that many people want to start churches instead of transitioning existing churches is because people want to hold on to what they already have. Rarely do you see a situation where a church truly transitions to become effective missionally, although it does happen. I think that it would be very difficult with an organization the size of the SBC.</p>
<p>My concern when it comes to the SBC is that we string together half-measures that have some effectiveness in the short term but primarily satisfy the people that we already have who are giving to support the mission. We should not be the target group. Until we reposition ourselves to exist for God and others, a Great Commission Resurgence will be something that is done in name only and it will eventually fail. A true missional lifestyle means that we start as disciples of Christ. If we are a disciple of Jesus, our concern is not for ourselves.  Yes, keep what is effective and working. No doubt about that. But the willingness to see things differently and sacrifice our own lives must accompany any structural changes.</p>
<p>I have no doubt that Dr. Reid, Tony, and everyone here agrees with that. I just wanted to clarify that change for the sake of change is a dangerous as staying the same. A heart change, followed by structural change to assist the mission is what is required. I&#8217;m praying for it.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>Alan Crosss last blog post..<a href="http://www.downshoredrift.com/downshoredrift/2009/04/the-full-meaning-of-holiness-it-might-be-different-from-what-you-think.html" rel="nofollow">The Full Meaning of Holiness &#8211; It Might Be Different From What You Think</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Kummer</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>Dr. Reid,
Thanks for your comments. I think you&#039;ve done a great job raising the issues to a new level. I am encouraged that so many are responding positively to your post. I truly respect contribution with this post. 

But when I am still cautious about the outcome. When the conversation turns to specifics, will the desire for change be strong enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Reid,<br />
Thanks for your comments. I think you&#8217;ve done a great job raising the issues to a new level. I am encouraged that so many are responding positively to your post. I truly respect contribution with this post. </p>
<p>But when I am still cautious about the outcome. When the conversation turns to specifics, will the desire for change be strong enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alvin reid</title>
		<link>http://sbcvoices.com/sbc-tp/#comment-2587</link>
		<dc:creator>alvin reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sbcvoices.com/?p=1302#comment-2587</guid>
		<description>I would add that I just posted the first of two articles related specifically to evangelism from my new book at alvinreid.com.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;alvin reids last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alvinreid.com/archives/518&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Toward a Great Commission Resurgence: Convergent Evangelism, Part One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add that I just posted the first of two articles related specifically to evangelism from my new book at alvinreid.com.</p>
<p><abbr><em><abbr><em>alvin reids last blog post..<a href="http://alvinreid.com/archives/518" rel="nofollow">Toward a Great Commission Resurgence: Convergent Evangelism, Part One</a></em></abbr></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
