One of Satan’s tactics in deceiving Christians and other humans is in telling them “That’s Just a Small Sin.” Joel Beeke in Striving Against Satan says it this way: “Satan minimizes the seriousness of sin, then leads us on to greater sins. Sin encroaches upon us, moving from our thoughts to our looks to our words and then to our actions.” ” …Technically, there is no such thing as a little sin because there is no little God to sin against.” “…When Satan tempts you to commit a little sin, tell him that you will not displease your greatest Friend who died for all your sin–including your smallest sins–by yielding to his greatest enemy (pg.76).”
Here are some random “small sins” that Satan taught us (Christians) ; along with the true sins that we’re ignoring:
1) Satan teaches us to say, “I ate too much,” but the underlying true sin is “I believed food was the gospel at this moment.” or “I loved food more than God at this moment.”
2) Satan teaches us to say, “I looked at a beautiful woman lustfully, but I didn’t touch her;” or “I looked at a handsome man lustfully, but I didn’t touch him.” but, the underlying true sin is “I committed adultery” or “I committed sexual immorality.”
3) Satan teaches us to say, “I really enjoyed the intimate conversation I had with a friend–other than my spouse–of the opposite or same sex. I look forward to speaking/chatting/texting with him or her soon.” but, the underlying true sin is “I committed adultery.” (This is true because conversations that should be had with your spouse, shoud indeed be had with your spouse, and not someone else. Marriage is the 2nd most important relationship on earth, 2nd only to your relationship with God. Marriage is even more important than your relationship with your children, parents, friends, etc.)
4) Satan teaches us to say, “I only thought about that man or woman sexually, I didn’t actually do anything with him or her.” but, the underlying true sin is “I committed adultery or sexual immorality.”
5) Satan teaches us to say, “I only extremely dislike that person,” but, the underlying true sin is “I am a murderer (1 John 3:15).”
6) Satan teaches us to say, “I don’t want my child marrying a minority race because they will have a harder life,” but, the underlying true sin is “I am a racist” (This is evident based on the strange conundrum in the South that interracial relationships are OK so long as a white person doesn’t marry a black or hispanic person. Call it what it is: racism.) or, “I believe God is a liar because some humans are more valuable than others.” (Children will have a harder life if they’re overweight, have a big nose, are short, or very tall, etc. Yet, only a few races seem to be discriminated against…)
7) Satan teaches us to say, “You make me so mad,” but, the underlying true sin is, “It’s my world, not God’s world, and everyone else is just living in it.” or “My sin is your fault, not the fault of my wicked heart.”
8 ) Satan teaches us to say, “If I just had ‘fill in the blank with any sin or blessing that isn’t Christ’ my life would be complete,” but, the underlying true sin is, “The abundant life is not found in Jesus Christ, but is found in other blessings or sin.”
9) Satan teaches us to say, “I’d rather watch sports than spend time with my wife or children,” but, the underlying true sin is, “I love sports more than my wife, children, and God.” (This of course is not saying that Christians cannot watch sports. I’m merely saying that Christians must be careful not to love sports above other more biblically important things: God, family, the church, friends, etc. Sports should be way down on the list of loves in our lives.)
10) Satan teaches us to say, “If I could just start another church, my theology and doxology would produce a flourishing congregation,” but, the underlying true sin is “I am the answer for what ails Christ’s church. I am the gospel.” or “I want a church that looks, thinks, and acts exactly like me.”
11) Satan teaches us to say, “God hasn’t spoken to me yet, telling me to share the gospel with someone (Matt. 28:18-20), to attend church regularly (Heb. 10:25), or to serve in ministry with the local church (Rom. 12:1-8),” but, the underlying true sin is, “My relative opinion of what God is saying apart from the Bible is more accurate than the written, breathed into existence Word of God embedded in thousands of years of history (2 Tim. 3:16-17).”
12) Satan teaches us to say, “No one was saved today, I’m a failure,” but, the underlying true sin is, “The salvation of Christ’s church depends ultimately on me, not God.” (The reality is that you cannot blame yourself if someone doesn’t repent, unless you also pat yourself on the back when someone does repent. Christ will grow His church, and we shouldn’t try to compete with Him.)
13) Satan teaches us to say, “Our church is getting the job done moreso than other churches because we’re the biggest in the community, city, state, nation, or world,” but, the underlying true sin is “We don’t love our neighbors that have yet to believe.” (In other words, as long as there is an unbeliever out there in our community, or in the world even, we should have a healthy dissatisfaction with our ministries. Our work isn’t finished until the entire world woships God alone through Christ alone by faith alone.)
What are your thoughts?
” . . . We are sinners,
but we do not know how great.
He alone knows who died for our sins. ”
(John Henry Newman)
A significant number of these “sins” may not be sins at all. Maybe it is a “legalist” whispering in my ear.
I guess I need a little clarity on #3. By “intimate conversation” do you mean a conversation that is sexually intimate? Or is it merely a conversation that is deeply personal in a non-sexual sort of way?
If it is the latter, I have no problem with this. My wife is my best friend and vice versa. However, there are just some conversations that can be had with her lady friends that will probably never be had with me. The same could be said of my conversations with my guy friends. They can be deeply personal, but certainly are not a betrayal of the marriage covenant. The conversations are not kept secret, it’s just guy stuff and girl stuff, and we may even talk about it between us later on.
If it is the former, then it is certainly inappropriate and should be stopped immediately.
I’m just curious what context of conversation you were addressing here.
Randy
Randy, not merely sexually IMO. I think adultery can be committed with parents, friends, children, etc. without any sexual activity involved. Any conversation that diminishes the one-flesh relationship we have with our spouses should be deemed a form of adultery. It’s not something I can necessarily pinpoint in someone else’s life, but I should know if I’m having a conversation with someone else that I should be having with my spouse.
A good question to ask is, “Am I getting something from this person that I should be seeking from my spouse instead of from this person?” Am I seeking something from this person because I’m not getting it at home? Much physical adultery begins with emotional adultery first.
I think we are definitely in agreement on this. Thanks for the clarification. I worry that too many times we relegate certain friendships above our marital relationships. The only thing that bears more importance than the relationship to our spouse is our relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. I see it manifest in somewhat insidious ways at times.
One of the sneakiest ones is elevating the importance of children above the importance of the marital relationship. Mom and Dad are rushing all over the place to see to the childrens’ various activities and see that as being good parents and good spouses. They neglect any personal time with each other for time with the children. Then they cannot figure out why their marriage falters.
Some do the same thing with friends. They have a confidant that they share secrets with that they do not share with their spouse.
Adultery is a strong word for such things, but I think you have defined it well within it’s bounds. Man, some spouses are committing adultery with their Xbox 360! You might label it idolatry, but I think it bears the label of adultery as well at times.
Nothing wrong with the 360, the problem is with the guy or gal that becomes too “intimate” with it.
I have found in marital counseling that even though actual physical adultery may not be going on, the sort of adultery you are describing is at the root of marital problems. Thanks again.
Randy
Randy, you make some great points. Maybe adultery isn’t the best term? Christ however seems to say that adultery can be committed in one’s heart without any outward actions. We need to see if we have an adulterous heart in any form or fashion. Christians are to be “one woman men.” Our marriage relationship is more important than our other human relationships. I appreciate your point about children as well. Our relationship with our spouses should have primacy over our relationship with our children.
The medieval Catholic Church classified sin according to degree. The Bible does not teach we are utterly sinful, but that we cannot do anything to meet God’s standards. Christ atones for us, and we believe this by faith; it’s impossible to please God without faith.
Sal, I’m not sure what you’re saying here.
This post is quite convicting. Unfortunately, I am guilty of committing many of these specific sins I won’t name them. Suffice it to say that I’ve heard my spot-on sermon for the day!
Jared, I’m in agreement that classification of sin makes little or no sense. Sin is sin and that barrs us from God. Hence, Christ came. I don’t reject classification because of something like ‘total depravity’. While I’m certain we’re profoundly sinful, I don’t think we’re totally so. Sinful enough to require God’s plan of restoration, obviously. I suppose that if we were completely depraved we’d never give a kind remark or do a kind deed. So I guess we’re radically sinful, as in the acronym ‘roses’.
Sal, I don’t want to debate you here over total depravity; but, if Satan can transform himself into an angel of light, then his servants probably can as well. Just because we’re capable of good in human terms doesn’t mean that total depravity isn’t true. IMO.
I’m not sure I’ve ever heard Satan speak to me directly. Is that metaphor? And if I have heard him, my guess is he speaks more loudly in accusation–after the temptation blooms into full-flowered sin–than before. I really require very little convincing when I choose to sin.
To spend much time focusing on Satan’s direct influence seems to me to invoke the Flip Wilson fallacy: “the Devil made me do it!!”
Jared, I believe the metaphors get at something true: our works are as nothing before God. Nevertheless, that does not mean we’re totally sinful. It does mean we can’t save ourselves. I would say we’re radically sinful.
Comments on this entry are closed.