*affirmed the miracles of Jesus and the virgin birth.
*affirmed the inerrancy of scripture (as expressed in the Chicago Statement)
*affirmed the verbal, plenary inspriation of scripture.
*affirmed homosexuality as being a sin without any exceptions whatsoever.
*affirmed the historicity of Genesis 1-11. Heck, I’d even take an Old Earther who said that Adam and Eve were the first humans, they were created, and the fall happened as it is recorded.

(crickets chirping)

Can’t name one, Tom? Yeah, thought so.

It’s just too bad the CR didn’t go far enough. Anyone who got hurt, lost a job, had to move, whatever, in the CR got WAY better than they deserved.

I bet with Rev. John it has less to do with a lack of understanding but a willful rejection of clear scriptural truth because it’s easier to make up his own guidlines rather than live by what God has decreed. Hence the reason the phrase “Jesus Christ is the standard for interpreting scripture” had to be updated in the BFM 2000 because it allowed mainstreamers/moderates to say “Oh, well, Paul could’t have meant that because Jesus was much too loving to EVER have meant that.”

Poppycock.

There’s absolutely nothing wrong with women sharing the Gospel; or in OT times for them to prophesy….tell the nation what God told them to tell the nation; nothing wrong with Deborah being a Judge over Israel, due to the fact that there was no man man-enough to do it at that time…it was a reluctant thing…besides we’re talking about OT Israel here, and not the NT Church….and besides again, we’re talking about her being a Judge, not a Rabbi, not a Priest. So, once again, very bad understanding of the Bible being displayed.

Lottie Moon could share the Gospel with every man on this planet, and that still wouldn’t have been teaching over men in a group type setting….like in a CHURCH. And, when she did teach men, she did it reluctantly….reluctantly….due to no men being around who could do it. I believe she looked upon her ministry as being to the women and children in China.

A lack of understanding the Bible can lead people to all kinds of confusing ideas, and can cause them to not see the truth of the Scripture.

David

DAve and others here have asked us to move on and not get away from things germane to the topic.

We are drifting here. I don’t know what your status is on this board among your funamentalist brethren but maybe you could open a topic about the CR, the GCR and the CR’s Ethical History and what not.
Until then for the time being not much use in engaging a discussion with a fellow who wouldn’t know the BX 6400′s from a Hole in the Ground.
Have a Blessed Day and do google the insidehighered piece on Erskine. World of Inerrancy talk and enlightenment discussion there and what happens when a faith community leaves the reservation for the Promised Land of Karl Rove and Richard Land.
For an incremental starter there, you may want to see Adrian Rogers son David at SBCimpact.net on the Idolatry of Politics.
But remember, that is just the starter. From there world of exploration waiting just for you in the BX 6400′s.
Maybe go straight for Barry Hankins Uneasy in Babylon and look up Gushee and Carey Newman in the Index and their experience with Al Mohler in 94 at SBTS, a hire by Mohler after Honeycutt if that gives you a clue.

And no, what Joe Blackmon believes really doesn’t matter–it’s what the Bible says. And since it says something different than what N.T. Wright says, he’s the one with the problems.