Southern Baptists and other Evangelicals are beginning to recognize the incredible opportunity and responsibility set before us. As the above infographic from www.ethnecity.com demonstrates, the nations have come to us en masse. Between 41 and 47 million foreign born peoples (by latest estimate) now live in the United States (13.2 million in the South). Many come from nations where Christianity is the predominant religious background. Many more do not. The challenges and opportunities facing the church today are enormous and they exist on multiple levels:
- How will American Christians integrate immigrant Christians from around the world into their churches? How will we assist in helping form new churches? How will denominational agencies and church planting networks engage with immigrants and immigrant church planting movements? We need visible and specific strategies to “welcome the stranger” in our midst and equip our current churches to engage, minister to, and advocate for the immigrant, sojourner, and refugee that has come to us.
- How will American Christians engage with immigrants who are non-Christians? Obviously, not everyone will be a Christian who comes. What of the Muslim? The Hindu? The non-religious? How will we deal with the multiplicity of perspectives flooding into our nation? How will we learn to live in a multiethnic, multicultural, and multi religious world?
- How will American Christians engage with immigrants and refugees with the gospel, compassion, mercy, advocacy, and hospitality? How can we help our churches become immigration centers that welcome and assist immigrants in their transition into our communities? What if the local church was the front door through which newcomers came to America? What if the church existed to meet needs, plant seeds of love and the gospel, and pull the weeds of injustice up so that newcomers could better connect with life here and begin to flourish instead of languish?
- How will American Christians advocate for immigrants and refugees and their situation? There are so many challenges and obstacles for immigrant families. What if the local church became the advocate for them? How would that change their perspective on the gospel.
In addition to immigrants and refugees coming to the United States, we also must look at what is happening in countries overseas. Wars and rumors of wars, persecutions, famines and earthquakes, violent and oppressive ideologies, conflict, economic volatility – all of the things that Jesus spoke about in Matthew 24:3-14 are creating a “push” effect that is sending people away from their homes and places of origin. Estimates are that there are over 60 million refugees in the world today. Many have left their home countries. Many more are displaced within their home countries. The church that engages in immigrant/refugee ministry where they are locally, will also be the church that finds itself equipped to take the gospel and aid to refugees in other countries that have been displaced and are seeking to rebuild broken lives. Here is a picture of what we are looking at in countries around the world regarding internal displacement:
The world is seeing over 24,000 people per day displaced from their homes and having to set out in search of safety, security, and survival. This is already a global crisis. How will the church in North America respond?
“The world is in a tremendous displacement crisis that is relentlessly building year after year, and now too many places have the perfect storm of conflict and/or disasters,” said Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, which runs IDMC.
“We have to find ways to protect people from these horrendous forces of both nature and the man-made ones.”
The U.N. refugee agency has said the number of people forcibly displaced worldwide was likely to have “far surpassed” a record 60 million in 2015, including 20 million refugees, driven by the Syrian war and other drawn-out conflicts.
The IDMC report said displacement in the Middle East and North Africa had “snowballed” since the Arab Spring uprisings that began in 2010 and the rise of the Islamic State militant group, which is waging war in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere.
“What has really led to the spike we have seen most recently has been the attack on civilians – indiscriminate bombing and air strikes, across Syria but also Yemen,” said Alexandra Bilak, IDMC’s interim director. “People have nowhere to go.”
Globally, there were 19.2 million new cases of people forced from their homes by natural disasters in 2015, the vast majority of them due to extreme weather such as storms and floods, IDMC said.
In Nepal alone, earthquakes in April and May uprooted 2.6 million people.
(Source: World Economic Forum)
Can’t we see it? Shouldn’t we be asking, “What is God doing in all of this?” Our current situation is the context of our discipleship and sanctification – if we will engage. Everything that Jesus talked about in Matthew 24 in the Olivet Discourse is happening. War. Nations rising against each other. Famines. Earthquakes. Persecution. Violence. Messianic figures. A great falling away. I am not trying to predict Jesus’ return, but I will note that he sets the stage for what will be happening before His return. But, this is the key that applies to us whether or not the return of Christ is near: “And this gospel of the Kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” (vs. 14). Could it be that instead of JUST saying what will happen right before Jesus’ return, He is also telling us that when these things happen, that the gospel of the Kingdom will be proclaimed in the midst of these events? Instead of seeing this great upheaval as something to run away from and protect ourselves against, what if Christians saw these things as opportunities to run TO so that people affected and displaced could hear of a God who loves them and offers them refuge? What if the violence and upheaval amongst the nations was actually a perfect opportunity for the people of God to show sacrificial love to people in great need around the world? What if we had a Matthew 24 perspective when it came to our own discipleship and mission and what is our own sanctification (being set apart from the world FOR the Kingdom of God) was manifested and realized as we joined God in ministering to the least and lost? Instead of seeing these things as a threat to our American identity, what if we saw these things as a clarion call upon our Kingdom identity to throw off comfort and security and to take on the mantle of ambassadors of Christ?
These are just a few questions that Christians and churches in North America must answer if they want to better understand and engage in what God is doing through the global migrations that are happening right now. Acts 17:24-28 says that God knows and sets the times and places where people will live and that He does this so they will reach out to Him and find Him, for He is not far from each one of us. How can the church better respond to the presence of immigrants and refugees from all over the world? We will explore all of this at the upcoming Reaching the Nations in North America Conference, August 26-27, 2016 in Brentwood, TN. This is a first of its kind conference sponsored by the International Mission Board, the North American Mission Board, and the Baptist conventions of Tennessee and North Carolina. Keynote speakers will be JD Payne, Ed Stetzer, and Jenny Yang of World Relief. There will be breakout sessions and tracks for denominational leaders and practitioners on the ground. The whole purpose of the conference will be to help equip the American church for the mission before us – and ultimately for our own following of Christ in the times and places that He has set us in. See the recent Baptist Press article on the conference for further information. This concept of engaging in mission along the fault lines of global migrations and people movements is being called Diaspora Missions. It can also be seen as an Acts 17 strategy – that instead of us sending missionaries to unreached peoples, we receive the people who come to us from around the world with hospitality, sacrificial love, gospel ministry, aid, and advocacy.
According to latest Census.gov estimates, the American South has over 121 million people, which is by far the most populous region of the country (37.7% of the nation’s population). With over 13.2 million first generation foreign born (11.2% of the Southern population) in the Southern states ranging from Virginia/Maryland to Florida to Texas/Oklahoma (where Southern Baptists and Evangelicals have their largest footprint), a perspective on how we pivot to, reach, engage, minister to, and advocate for the immigrants and refugees who are now our neighbors is needed more than ever before. What if the Southeastern United States became known more for its biblical hospitality toward immigrants than for turning away from them? What if churches in the South led the way on engagement and invitation to immigrants who have come to live among us? What if Christians in the South took on the needs and problems of immigrants and began to bless them and advocate for them as though they were our own family members? What if instead of 85% of immigrants never being invited into an American’s home, we reversed that number completely and invited at least 85% of immigrants into the homes of Christians in the South to build relationships with them? How different would our future be? The future of America and of the American church is being created right now. What will it look like? How will the gospel be planted into the lives of people who are newly arrived? If Acts 17 is true and God really does determine the exact times and places where people will live so they will reach out to Him and find Him because He is not far from each one of us (vs. 24-28), then what is the responsibility of Christians and churches who are already in this land to “welcome the stranger” who is coming to us from places around the world? What if we look at all of this through a perspective on what God might be doing to bring His salvation to the people’s of the world instead of seeing it through a lens of fear and self-protection?
This conference seeks to help answer these questions. There is a growing movement of churches and Christians in the South who are waking up to the opportunities to sacrificially love our neighbors as those made in God’s image that He is bringing right before us. Will we see what is happening? Will we love them? Will we be a voice for the voiceless (Proverbs 31:8-9) and defend the rights of the destitute and the poor and needy? Will we sacrifice our own lives to take up their cause and consider their needs ahead of our own (Phil. 2:1-5)? I will be leading a breakout session on Immigration Centers as platforms for the gospel to enable churches to do just this. I hope that you will either attend or follow along with the ensuing conversation related to Reaching the Nations in North America and also those across the seas.
One last thought: A good friend of mine is engaged with the church in Europe and has told me that he has been to meeting after meeting of German pastors and church leaders who recognize the moment before them. They have stopped their previous plans and set aside their agendas and are planning, praying, and working to welcome and minister to the refugees who have come to them. Thousands are coming to Christ and thousands more are being helped and served by the church in Germany. They recognize the crisis and see that the times that they live in have become the arena for their own discipleship and faithfulness to God. Will we do the same? Or, will we miss this moment that God has designed for us because we long for a moment in the past that never really was?
Finally, this video from the InternationalProject.org called “The Foreigner Among Us” beautifully explains what is happening around the world. Perhaps I should have led with this, but I wanted to start with questions. What is in this video contains many of the answers that we seek.
For further information and resources for connection, ministry/mission engagement, and advocacy (among many more, but this is a start), start by checking out …
Keelan Cook’s People’s Next Door blog
Missiologically Thinking: J.D. Payne
Ethnecity.com
Peoplegroups.info
The International Project
Reaching the Scattered Nations
Immigration, the Gospel, and Southern Baptists in a Nation in Turmoil
People’s Next Door North Carolina
The Evangelical Immigration Table
World Relief
Alan,
Truly it seems that God is bringing the nations to our doorstep. I agree that we need to reach out to them. Did you know that there’s something like 119 or 120 different ethnic groups in the Nashville area? I mean, it’s nothing to see people from all kinds of countries when eating or shopping in Nashville.
I know that here in my little town that one of the businesses brought in a bunch of Mexicans, one time. And, I got the ladies in the churches of our community to bake them some goodies, and we took them to the Mexican fella’s, along with Tracts and Bibles written in Spanish. I had a small handful of people, who did NOT like that we did that, at all. But, we did it and had a blast.
Back when I was in seminary in Memphis and on staff at Leawood Baptist Chur h, a refugee group from Laos called the H’mong people, met at our church. I was their Pastor for 4 years. It was a great and sweet time of ministry, with a lot of great memories. I had the joy of leading many of them to Christ.
Yes, no matter how one might feel about securing our borders and vetting any refugees to make sure that they are not terrorists, gang bangers, or criminals; still, as Believers, when refugees come into our country then we should be ready to reach them with the Gospel.
David
Alan is one of the speakers for the conference.
Registration $35 is through the North Carolina Baptists website where you can find the conference schedule and list of speakers and breakout sessions: http://www.ncbaptist.org/index.php?id=1898
If any of you have time during the SBC in St. Louis, you may want to check out what Oasis International (Oasis International in South City is doing. They “fill in the gaps” for refugees that the government and official NGOs do not fill. They are explicitly gospel centered, yet highly respected by even the Muslim refugees. It’s a very good model that can be supported by groups of churches. The startling statistic they share is that less than10% of immigrants (refugee or otherwise) have an American they can call a friend.
These situations present great opportunities for the Gospel.
Our church is very involved in reaching immigrant communities. We have had one woman in our church who intentionally rented an apartment in a complex that has many refugees. She says that she can have a family in her home every night for dinner.
Sharing the Gospel with some of these immigrants is difficult because they find themselves in a hostile culture, so sometimes that can make them more resistant to the Gospel, because religion is one aspect of their culture that they can hold on to.
I agree that there is much that the church can and should be doing.
When it comes to the political issues of how many immigrants to admit, under what conditions, and what to do with people who are here illegally, I believe that individual Christians should seek to inform themselves and make the wisest decisions they can make. I do not believe that churches and church organizations should take public stands in most cases on these issues because they feelings of their constituents may vary greatly, and I believe that the organizations should be fair to all of their members.
For example, I am fully for ministering to and helping immigrants who are here legally.
But I do not think it is contrary to the Gospel or the teachings of Jesus if a person has political opinions about immigration that would result in restricting or reducing the number of immigrants – for fiscal, safety or other reasons, or if a person has political opinions about what to do with people who are here illegally. Reports said that last week over 38,000 people were apprehended attempting to cross the Southern border of the U.S. I do not know what was done with these people – if they were turned back, if they did the “catch and release” thing that Obama has pushed, or if they are being held.
But as I said last week in a post, we should not conflate a love for Jesus, the Gospel, and a love for other people with a particular political view about how to deal with immigration. We are to love our neighbor, but that includes our own families, our existing neighbors, our communities, people who seek to enter the U.S., and people who live in other lands.
How to balance our love for all of those people means at some point we may have to make difficult choices (e.g. we declare war on another country or we invade that country; we advocate for strong border security; we advocate for putting the people fleeing some countries in safe zones in their own countries rather than saying everyone should come here).
So long as the church is fair and even handed in the political arena and does not become captivated to any side politically – the church can still go after ministering to those immigrants from all countries who are here legally – and we should do that. These two things are not in conflict.
“So long as the church is fair and even handed in the political arena and does not become captivated to any side politically – the church can still go after ministering to those immigrants from all countries who are here legally – and we should do that. These two things are not in conflict.”
Yet, you bring up politics and advocate for your position quite regularly. Then, you say that a church/ministry should not take a position on this issue that affects politics because it might offend some of its members. Then, you say that we should minister to those who are here LEGALLY.
A few things:
1. You seem rather captivated by political interests. That is okay. I am not opposed to you being involved politically. But, don’t advocate your view and then say that anyone advocating a different view is out of bounds.
2. I actually think that churches/ministries should absolutely promote certain views from a prophetic perspective irrespective of the opinions of their members – IF the views are biblically based. The last thing that pastors need to do is to take public opinion polls before they speak out on certain issues in our society. Leaders should lead and inform the views of congregants. Yes, have dialogue and listen. But, we should not stay neutral on everything out of fear of offending.
3. I would say that we should minister to all who are here – legally or illegally. No church should check for immigration papers before ministering the gospel and aid to someone – nor does the law call for that. And, overtime a state tried to put those burdens on churches, the courts struck those laws down as unconstitutional. People are made in the image of God and should receive and experience the love of the church and Christians despite their immigration status. Let the State enforce the law as it sees fit.
This post was not about politics, but you brought that perspective in. Again, that is fine. It demonstrates how politically charged this issue is. But, I would contend that we first see immigrants as people and then look at what God might be doing – and let that perspective inform our political positions first instead of trying to bring in cautions about political boundaries when talking about caring for and ministering to people. And, finally, as citizens of a Democratic Republic, the law is not fixed/set on this issue. “We the people” have every right and responsibility to seek to influence the law from whatever perspective we are influenced by – and from a Biblical perspective, most directly.
Alan:
I am not saying Christians should not have political positions or ideas. I do. Mine are not “out of bounds”. You do. Yours are not “out of bounds.”
You are my brother in Christ. We may disagree over politics and that is fine.
What I object to is trying to claim that Jesus blesses one kind of political position, and not the other.
And I am against churches or denominational ministries taking one political position.
I am not against any Christian who has his/her political opinion.
Fortunately, our church does not take positions on the refugee crisis, the US/Mexican border, and such.
If we did, I would be opposed to that, even if it was the position that I advocate.
I am opposed to the ERLC taking specific positions on immigration. I have not followed the ERLC closely lately on this issue, but I have heard statements to the effect that Christians should be in favor of “comprehensive immigration reform” or such.
I believe that the ERLC should not take a position on this issue because it is not a clear thing and Christians should be able to hold their various positions, and have their pastors, denominational leaders etc. be neutral.
Thanks for letting me add to my perspective of how our church ministers to immigrants in our community, how we balance that with the political issue.
I believe that is an important thing for Christians and Churches to learn.
Louis,
Political positions are not neutral nor are they necessarily without gospel influence. For example, I would affirm a position that was against abortion. I think that we should be prophetic on that issue and represent God’s way – the way of Jesus here. He would support care for innocent life. In the same way, the Bible is very clear as to how we should treat the poor, the widow, the orphan, and the sojourner. While the church does not dominate politics and the church is not the state, we are called to witness to the Kingdom and influence others by being salt and light. I do think that there is a perspective on how we should treat children and families – workers and the poor.
Well said, Alan.
John fariss
Alan:
Depending on what you mean, I agree.
Let’s first distinguish between issues that are more clear from issues that are not.
The issue of abortion involves the taking of innocent human life. That is an issue of first importance and the Christian Church has been opposed to it for its history. Southern Baptists agree in vast majorities on this issue.
Economics, for example, is a different issue. I strongly believe in economic freedom, even as a moral issue, as opposed to centrally planned economies via socialism, communism or fascism.
But I do not think that the a preacher should try and cop opt Jesus words into a support of economic freedom, even though I firmly believe in it. I note that socialists regularly enlist Jesus in support of their goals when we all know that Jesus was presenting moral teaching and not laying a basis for economic theory.
How to handle the issue of immigration is very similar to economics vs. abortion. There is not a body of church law that has existed over 2000 years on the question, well meaning Christians disagree on how to address it, and I suspect in our churches that people disagree, and I know that people in the SBC disagree.
I do not think it is fair to take Jesus’ words about the treatment of the poor as a mandate for immigration. In fact, I believe it is not only unfair, it can amount to distorting Jesus’ actual intent.
As it relates to the SBC, on this issue the ERLC should candidly admit that there is no straight line from the Bible to policy, and should not be about cramming one particular political outlook on all of the SBC people.
Churches and the ERLC should work on those areas where there is no genuine disagreement in the areas of dealing with immigrants, and this includes Gospel outreach to them.
I admire you for having your perspective and for your good work. Again, we each can advocate our positions, and that is not out of bounds. But when we try to use the church and entities like the ERLC to advance our particular political opinions in questions like economics or immigration (complicated political questions as opposed to clear moral issues), that is not an admirable course.
Jesus is no more proud of you for your political position on immigration than he is mine.
That is a place of humility that we all should reach.
I don’t have a political opinion on this. My politics are classically conservative and I have always voted Republican. My positions, however, do align with biblical concepts of justice and mercy and the Bible is actually very clear on this. How should the poor be treated? Read Isaiah 58 or Zechariah 7. There are dozens of other passages. Now, America is not Israel. But, the Church has the position of being a “kingdom witness” in a secular society, so we speak to the better way of Jesus publicly, not by trying to control, but by trying to witness. I think that the way that we treat immigrants is very much a biblical issue. At the same time, a secure border, protecting a nation’s citizens, the rule of law, and having legal immigration are all important issues that can also be promoted from a Justice/Mercy Biblical perspective. I absolutely believe that how the church reacts to, ministers to, and advocates for the sojourner is a biblical issue. It is all over the Bible and is totally intertwined with the whole concept of “love your neighbor.” The way we treat the “other” is very much connected with how we have received and value the grace of God ourselves. Speaking prophetically into our governing system is just an expression of that care/concern (Proverbs 31:8-9).
Language is generally a huge barrier. So I see some trends here:
1. The All-American, English-Only Sentiment. I know many of my fellow conservative (politically and theologically) Americans who are all about how immigrants should learn English and only use English. They need to assimilate. Generally, however, I think this is an excuse to not have to learn another language or to engage a people with the Gospel for whom English is a second language and is a difficult learning process for them.
2. The Ghettoized Church. This is where we put people who don’t speak English. “Which church do you go to?” “The Korean church.” Why do we even have a Korean church? Because language is a barrier. So that means that only the Koreans in America should be ministering to Korean speakers because real Americans only speak English? Something is wrong with that picture.
3. Ministry Only Goes One Way. That is to say that immigrants are the ones who need to be ministered to and Americans are the only ones who can minister. If we have immigrants who are already Christians, we need their gifts in our churches to go alongside of ours so that we can minister to each other and minister alongside each other in carrying out the GC.
So we need to get over the idea of English-only. The fact is, it’s better on immigrants if they learn English, but we can’t wait on them to learn English to share the Gospel with them or welcome them into our churches. That means a couple of things need to happen:
1. We need to learn some new languages. Christians in the pews need to get over our resistance to learning new languages. (That said, we need to get over our resistance to sharing the Gospel.) We also need to learn English better so we can teach it to immigrants. TESL/TEFL is an effective device for missions overseas. It works here too.
2. We need to get innovative in doing multilingual services effectively. Technology can help here since we have it available. Automated verbal translators are improving. That’s one option. Individuals who can translate are also helpful. I’ve been overseas where I’ve been listening to a sermon with a local who knew English sitting next to me whispering translations in my ear. That fact is that it can be done and we should expect to do it.
3. Missionaries get linguistic training. If the foreign mission field is coming to us, we are now missionaries in need of linguistic training. If you have English Bibles in your churches, you might consider stocking a few in some common languages. I have printed Spanish and Arabic Bibles that I can use, and my smartphone will access even more.
The fact is Babel needs to be reversed in the Church. We need to tear down the linguistic walls for the purpose of proclaiming the Gospel.
Excellent, Jim. The American church definitely needs ministry. That is what I am praying for as well – that those who come here who are already Christians will help us see Jesus better as we learn and receive from them too.
Jim:
I agree with you on the language issue.
While I fully support any and all active efforts to see that English remains the official language of the US, the church needs to work like crazy to communicate to people in their languages.
ESL is a big way that churches can help, I believe.
Just a point of fact: English is not the “official language” of the US. We don’t have one.
Great article Alan. Registration is still open, $35 http://tinyurl.com/reachingthenations
Registration Fee is waived for college and seminary students.
Alan, I respect your compassion and belief in what you are doing. a question I have had and never gotten a good answer is how long will the Spanish speaking churches exist to reach the newly arrived people be needed. Is there always going to be a need for a Spanish speaking separate program, or a Creole , or a Arabic, or a Farsi and the list goes on , are do you envision a day when the historic common language of the USA that has and continues to grow as the accepted language of world wide communication will be the language of the various religious outreach programs within the borders of the USA. I do respect that you are calling on people of faith to act upon their faith in regards to reaching the newly arrived and not petitioning for the government to assist in the issue. As we no longer demand, expect or value assimilation into the American culture, language, traditions and political system how will this play out within the next 50 years. Europe has lost her Christian heritage and is no longer a Christian centered culture but they have been accepting, gracious and accommodating to the mass influx of non Christian immigrants. Do you think that the majority of these immigrants will be open to the Gospel message. Look at the lack of assimilation that happens in Europe. I just have the feeling the SBC is getting into the minefield of politics , whether intentional or not.
As long as we view the Kingdom through our lens we will struggle with these issues. I think that we do not worship God in separate buildings because of language, or at least language alone. We each have our own communities and those communities have their own cultures. Traditionally the Church’s message has been to call the lost to leave their broken community and come and join our bright shiny redeemed community. This always leads to issues of worship style and division over myriads of non-essential issues that frustrate us. What if we planted Jesus into each broken community and expected him to redeem it? Communities of Korean, Vietnamese, Mexican, Cuban, etc etc could worship him with all their heart mind soul and strength but only if we taught them to trust in Jesus alone and refused to control and manipulate them. It is not an easy road. But I believe- because I practice this in a very multi-ethnic society in Middle Earth- that it could lead to real revival in the Church and a real evangelistic push among the unreached of America. If we set up such systems and expectations then far from the Church being divided we would love and respect each other more and cooperate more as a result.
Amen, Strider. Completely agree. The key to the renewal of the American church is found in the arriving and newly arrived immigrants.
Steve S, studies are showing that immigrants are integrating into American society faster than at any point in American history. It goes even faster when native born Americans interact with them. Second generation immigrants integrate very quickly now. Foreign language outreach is for first generation immigrants. Their children all learn English very quickly.
As for not petitioning the government, why would we not do that on any issue related to Biblical values? That is the government that we have the privilege of living in. There is nothing wrong – actually, it is totally appropriate to speak to our elected officials from a Biblical position. Why would we not open the Bible in our culture and speak into the political arena, not to control or build power for ourselves, but as a prophetic witness on behalf of the vulnerable? See Proverbs 31:8-9.
Alan:
Agree with much of your last reply to me.
We are dealing with the ethnic church issue in our City. There probably is not a best way to insist on how these churches should look – all ethnic vs. having an ethnic ministry in an existing congregation with the goal to eventually fully incorporate.
I think it’s a “both and” type of issue.
I note that in our City; however, that Korean churches are really well off, and build large facilities indicating the desire to be exclusively Korean churches into the future.
There is nothing wrong with that.
But I wonder if in the long run, those churches will remain Korean.
I have talked to people from the mid-West where the Baptist and Lutheran churches actually have German language carved into the church from construction 100 to 150 years ago. German is no longer the language spoken in those churches, as it used to be.
According to what I have read, it usually takes three generations for an “immigrant” family to thoroughly assimilate. In Warren County, NC (where I pastored my first church) there is a community called “Ridgeway.” In the late 1800s, I think about the third quarter, an entire German village emigrated there, bringing their Lutheran church with them. At least in church services, they exclusively spoke German until World War I came along, at which time they began using English, though still singing in German. Think about that timeline: from about 1875 or ’85 until 1917, one or two generations. When World War II came along, they mounted a flagpole in front of the church, illuminated with spotlights, and flew an American flag 24/7. Look at the timeline again: another generation, so that is about three. Sometime in the 1950s, they began singing hymns in English, and when I was there (late 1980s), only a few of the older members remembered when they sung German hymns. Today, though they remember their heritage, the only thing “German” about them are their distinctive last names.
The same thing happened in my family. My great-great-great grandparents showed up in South Carolina in the late 1760s. Though he lived for another 50 years, and even fought in the Revolutionary Way, it is said that my great-great-great-grandfather spoke only a few words of English when he died. His grandchildren, the oldest of whom was born just a few years before he died, do not seem to have known what language he was speaking, at least that is the story as it came down. The assumption made by my generation of descendants is that it was Gaelic, but no one knows, and as “Fariss” is actually an Arabic name, well, you buys your ticket and you takes your chances. And on my mother’s side, the Smith side, my first cousins thought the family was English until I told them that my mother remembered her father say they were “Dutch,” and that the name was originally Schmidt. And in all liklihood, what that earlier generation meant was that they were “Deutsch,” German that is, and not that they were “Neiderlanders.”
So if today’s immigrants, from the Middle East, Africa, or wherever, are assimilating faster than 3 or 4 generations–great. But don’t expect it to happen in a couple of years.
John, The German community in N.C. you know of did not receive any special benefits or attention from the local, state or national government. Legal immigration was seen as a method to benefit the USA, as people were needed with certain skills. The Immigration Dept. was set up in 1891 to oversee the immigration issue mainly though Ellis Island in NYC. Quotas were enacted to limit number with preference given to Northern Europe which was about 3 % of census total for admission by nationality. Asians were basically excluded by law. There are far more illegal aliens currently in this country than ever came legally though Ellis Island. People of faith who feel a biblical mandate to assist newly arrived people whether legal or illegal may do so and are following their faith teachings When the churches get into the political sphere of government assistance, education and all the other issues now associated with the immigration issue it creates a problem in our society. No President pushed a total assimilation of immigrants than Woodrow Wilson , a progressive . The USA took a generations break from 1924 to 1965 to assimilate and absorb the immigrants and that were immigrants from mostly northern Europe. The 1965 Immigration Act signed by President Johnson, sponsored by Ted Kennedy gave us the current terrible situation we now face. Now between the record number of legal immigrants and the unknown amount of illegal aliens that arrive each year it is a national problem that needs serious attention. Europe could not and does not assimilate the vast majority of their flood of mostly non Christian immigrants and the religious, cultural and social fabric of their countries are changed forever. So as people of faith, following their beliefs and acting with the absolute purist of biblical intent wade into a social, political, cultural and economic issue affecting this country there should be a serious objectivity to the reality of the effect of the never ending flood of illegal aliens into this country. I believe the SBC is getting into political issues and agendas too deeply. I think R. Moore of the ERLC has set the SBC on course of political activity that is not going to advance the mission of the SBC, as there will be a political and emotional backlash from the membership. Now it is a leaders job to lead but look at the direction that many mainline churches have taken their membership. We need to be careful as we stereotype and label those who disagree with not our faith but our political and economic solutions.
Steve S,
Good discussion. I am very familiar with the history that you cited. This is a situation where I trust that God is sovereign. They are already here. More are coming. We can spend our limited energy trying to stop what has already happened, or we can try and reach those who are already here. As for political involvement, I think that we can be prophetic and call for proper treatment, seek to keep families together, and consider the plight of children and workers and consider justice issues related to how the poor among us are treated. Hopefully; we can have civil discussions along those lines.
John, studies have shown that they are integrating much faster now than they were in the past – likely because of the pervasiveness of popular culture, communications, and technology.
I hope to make it to this, Alan. We even highlighted it on this week’s podcast episode. http://bit.ly/1TFlThm