Can you remember all of the things you were ticked off about last February? Other than the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl, I can’t either. But I bet you were outraged about something.
The folks at Slate, which by the way is a quite outrageous site, spent 2014 compiling all the instances of outrage. There was something every day that got us worked up on social media. Some of these were serious issues—others were obviously not worth our outrage.
I found this comment from one of the author’s of that piece to be telling:
…it’s fascinating to look at how our collective responses skipped from the serious to the [petty]without much modulation in pitch.
In other words when we get outraged about silly things we don’t have much a voice left for things that should really cause outrage. This alone should caution believers to be wary of keeping in step with our culture of outrage.
But there is another reason why Christians should not follow this culture of outrage; namely, it will never accomplish our goals. In his first chapter, James (the brother of Jesus) shows us why outrage doesn’t work:
Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God. Therefore put away all filthiness and rampant wickedness and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls. (James 1:19-21 ESV
)
Social Media and James 1:19-20
Social media does not lend itself to obeying James 1:19. You can’t wait a week to respond to a comment on Twitter or Facebook. If you do, you look like a stalker going through someone’s old posts. If you want to be relevant and in the conversation you have to respond within 15 minutes or you’ve lost your chance.
Being quick to listen and slow to speak, then, will mean that you miss speaking on the daily outrage. And when you miss speaking on the daily outrage you sacrifice potential traffic, retweets, likes, follows, and a bit of notoriety. It’s much easier to follow the knee-jerk reactions and follow the lemming off the cliff of outrage.
This extends, as well, to believers that are unaware of the big news story of each day–to those who are outraged about their deplorable circumstances. In fact, this is likely the situation of James’ original audience. They didn’t have Facebook or Twitter as their rage machine, but they had the local watering hole where they could go and express their anger. James is saying, spouting off in anger and speaking as a wise sage when you’ve only just been exposed to something is foolishness, and this whether your spout off on social media or the local well.
As Christians we have an option; obey James 1:19 or Follow the Daily Outrage. I say this because of what James says in verse 20. Notice the sentence begins with the word “for”. This is telling us the reason why we should be quick to hear, slow to speak, and slow to anger. And what is that reason? Because the anger of man (our daily outrage) does not produce the righteousness of God.
Following the daily outrage does not produce what Christians should be striving for; namely, the righteousness of God.
The Better Way
In verse 21 James shows us the better way. In meekness we should throw of the sins that are befitting our old selves (like anger and foolishness) and receive God’s Word. This—and not man’s anger—is able to accomplish our goal; namely, the saving of souls.
The better way is to have a day to day intake and output of God’s Word. God’s Word is always relevant. And I don’t even mean that God’s Word allows us to speak into the daily outrage no matter what it is. What I mean is that God’s Word is relevant apart from the daily outrage. There isn’t a day that goes by in which men aren’t sinners and Christ isn’t a Savior. That’ll preach any day.
This is not a call for silence. Nor is it a call to never speak on a daily outrage—even that day. It’s a call to listen to the wisdom of James instead of following our culture of outrage. There is much at stake if we parrot the world instead of follow the way of the Master in this area.
Good points, Mike.
It is evident that most of our media outlets (right and left leaning) have little regard for Jesus’ promises to the peacemakers. The old newspaper adage which says “if it bleeds…it reads” is alive and well.
We need a new Paul Harvey. Someone who can keep their balance and perspective.
Thanks
Doug,
I agree that the media needs another Paul Harvey. I’m not shocked though that the media outlets promote outrage. What I am outraged by (see what I did there?) is when Christians follow suit. We can’t afford to do this.
That’s well stated and wise.
I know I sound like a broken record, but I’ll keep saying it. Most evangelical’s political leanings lead them to pay close attention to media personalities whose job it is to keep their listeners angry all the time. And unfortunately, it works.
Do you think such a thing is/could be a temptation for pastors as well?
I don’t have a wide circle of pastors that I know so I don’t know if I can answer. I haven’t seen it with the pastors I do know. It is the folks in the pew where I see it most.
It’s interesting that James points out that it’s the righteousness of *God* that man’s anger does not produce, as one thing following the daily outrage does typically do is promote our own sense of *self*-righteousness.
Ben,
Good point.
In what I have seen, even well meaning godly pastors, who get outraged, really are not promoting the Kingdom, as much as they are promoting something else.
This post brings to my mind the recent furor over Eichenwald’s article in Newsweek. While, yes, the article was an invective more against the faith than the Bible, rife with extreme stereotypes of “Christians”, and confounding with poorly researched canonical scholarship, ummm, well, shouldn’t we expect that? Was “outrage” on the part of Christians appropriate? Don’t read what I’m not writing … I fully, firmly believe we must be prepared to defend our faith and give reason for the hope that is within us. But a secular magazine proffering a journalistic review of Scripture by a for-profit ink peddler could… Read more »