Blessed are they who hunger and thirst after conflict and controversy,
for in the Southern Baptist Convention they will eventually be satisfied.
– SBC Beatitude
“Yet forty days, and Ninevah shall be overthrown” wrote Jonah and our SBC Annual Meeting is forty days hence. While the magnitude of the meeting doesn’t look biblical it has the potential be catastrophic. In fact, it looks certain that there will be no shortage of rancor and acrimony. All in Good Christian Spirit as we Southern Baptists do rancor, one hopes.
Last year the alt-right mess was unexpectedly upon us and, although the, uh, right moves were made after the sausage making process of resolutions, we left Phoenix hot, parched, and with a denominational black eye.
This year here are some possibilities for more black eyes:
Paige Patterson, half of the Conservative Resurgence catalytic pair of Pressler/Patterson, is scheduled to preach our one and only convention sermon with the backdrop of having to revise, explain, and contextualize his “two black eyes” anecdote of 18 years ago about spousal abuse. It can’t be good when one of our icons feels the need to state that ““For the record, I have never been abusive to any woman” nor to explain how he has never condoned marital abuse. If a convention spokesman is explaining how the convention might remove the person voted to preach the convention sermon, that can’t be good either. Expect placard carrying protesters outside the convention hall over this one. What might be worse is if Patterson receives the enthusiastic standing ovation Ed Stetzer predicts. Here’s your headline in that case: “Southern Baptist leader who condoned domestic violence receives standing ovation.” No, that wouldn’t be a fair headline but media need not be fair.
We’ve got a candidate for president who is a new generation, who baptizes over seven hundred annually, who plants churches here and abroad by the hundreds, whose church is the sending church for more overseas missionaries than any other SBC church, who supports heavily the SBC, the Cooperative Program, our mission boards and his state convention, so there’s smooth sailing on this, right? Wrong. This is the most negative and contentious SBC presidential election since the 1990s. Several state convention leaders have lined up, rather aggressively, against one candidate. There’s a group who believes that defeating him would be saving the convention. That’s a license for mayhem. Some have labeled him and his church as not fully cooperative. Here’s the headline, “Greear elected SBC president in contentious election.” One can hope for a moment of grace and comity from Ken Hemphill and his supporters. I’d expect such from the candidate but not from supporters.
The resolutions process is always risky. Will we have more racially aimed resolutions presented? Will the Resolutions Committee, surely a group hyper-primed for the moment, be deft in their handling of matters? One hopes so.
The Committee on Nominations has already been criticized for the racial structure of their report. “Too Anglo,” we’re told, but they’re working on it. Will there be amendments offered from the floor, substitute nominees? It’s been done before.
Our Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission leader will be present and gets 27 minutes Wednesday afternoon for the ERLC report and presentation…and questions. The Trump wing of Southern Baptists considers him close kin to the antichrist. Maybe one of these will get to a mic. Hopefully…not.
David Platt, still the head of our largest and most important entity, the International Mission Board, will make his report. Seems odd, understanding that he has resigned. I’m thinking that many Southern Baptists have emotionally moved on to the next leader.
Not only does he have the Convention Sermon, Paige Patterson is set to give the Evangelism Task Force report. This is the group Steve Gaines asked for and received, an august body to look at the problem of declining baptisms. It has been noted that it is an all male group that will be recommending on evangelizing a population that is half female.
Ravi Zacharias and Dave Ramsey are special guests. Not suggesting anything untoward about them but why do we have all these celebs? LifeWay stores need a boost?
Dare I say that a strident anti-Greear, anti-Calvinist state convention leader gets the closing prayer for the convention. You can’t make this stuff up. Will he be in a good mood or a bad mood?
Augie Boto, thrust into the Executive Committee’s leadership position after Frank Page resigned suddenly, will give the EC’s report. He is a good man in whom we can have a lot of confidence.
I’ll be there. Should be…well…interesting. The Grand Old SBC will survive all of this but sometimes we make things hard on ourselves.
There are Southern Baptists who love this stuff but I make a motion that we go back to a convention that is incredibly, mind-numbingly boring.
__________
Your analysis seems spot on, William. The Dallas convention will be a lot of things, but I’m afraid boring will not be one of them. See you soon.
Why would we not want a healthy exchange of opinions by those who have problems with the stands the ERLC and their President take (or do not take) on moral, ethical and religious liberty concerns?
I think you and I read the same things Allen where there aren’t many healthy exchanges of opinions but rather a steady stream of conspiracy, talk show nonsense and the like. One hopes that these don’t get to a mic.
I didn’t mean to put this so close to Dwight’s piece and apologize for the timing. Presume that our erudite readers can handle two articles today.
So you say ” One can hope for a moment of grace and comity from Ken Hemphill and his supporters. I’d expect such from the candidate but not from supporters.”
Obviously not from Grear supporters, like yourself given that statement. Do you really believe the rancor has been one sided? Physician heal thyself.
Sorry, don’t buy that. The evidence is quite clear. I’d like to be persuaded otherwise but haven’t seen reason to be so.
William,
I don’t buy it either – There seems to be a talking point that “distortion and personal attacks toward Prez candidates is coming from both sides” – but I have yet to see any evidence of concerted and coordinated dishonest personal attacks against Ken Hemphill by supporters of JD Greear – but have seen boatloads of it from Hemphill supporters against Greear.
I also haven’t seen SBC convention (whether state or national) resources coordinated in support of Greear – while I have seen that for Hemphill.
I am convincible though… Perhaps Mark or one of the others who say “it goes both ways” have actual evidence of that being so.
Sorry for the double post
Interesting, I have not seen any “concerted and coordinated dishonest personal attacks” Against Grear. I have seen legitimate concerns raised. Those two are not the same things.
The very statement I quoted alone is evidence.Sorry you are part of the “Rancor”.
Yeah, “concerns” – just like the gossiper who presents his/her gossip in the form of concerns and prayer requests.
Well I guess you can call it what you want but that then puts the criticizers of the gossipers as gossipers. My point is the accusation is self defeating. Any criticism of Grear is being painted as “gossip”, questioning the fact that Grears church does not know they are SBC is being painted as being aggressively against him, all of those statements are in and of themselves the exact same nature of the comments they are meant to condemn. Criticizing someone for criticizing someone is hypocritical. Further, the characterizations of the criticism is hyper inflated, over the top, and in fact just not true.
No – the specific issue you’re mentioning is an issue of context… And just as I defended Paige Patterson over context when it was being intimated that he supported abusung women… I will defend JD Greear over context.
I will not rehash it again with you… But the context of Greear’s statement that y’all are running with has been explained to the 316 crowd numerous times and you all still refuse to give any grace whatsoever.
The Louisiana Baptist Message has two interesting articles. One that supports J. D. Greear…
http://baptistmessage.com/jeremy-shepherd-viewpoint-i-support-j-d-greear-and-here-is-why/
David R. Brumbelow
That is a good move and I commend the LBM for doing it. I made a similar offer to the 316 blog – SBCVOICES puts up a “I’m for KH” piece and SBCT puts up a “I’m for JDG” piece…I never got an answer. “No thanks” would have been fine. “Sure, we’re all on the same side anyway” would have been better.
But, who knows? Maybe there can still be an authentic moment of grace and comity as in 2016.
And, one that supports Ken Hemphill.
http://baptistmessage.com/robert-jeffress-bobby-welch-endorse-hemphill-for-sbc-president/
David R. Brumbelow
So, according to Bobby Welch… if Hemphill should he win the presidency of the SBC … He Will resign his interim pastorship in Missouri(?) and his administrative/teaching gigs at The Bible college in South Carolina??
He’s going to be the first “full-time” volunteer president of the Southern Baptist convention?
I agree that’s interesting.
Tell us, please – What exactly does a full-time SBC president do? And what does that say about the similarly doctrinally aligned Steve Gaines and Ronnie Floyd, Fred Luter, Johnny Hunt, Frank Page, etc…who weren’t “Full-time presidents” what is Hemphill Expected to do that these guys didn’t?
Everything. And nothing. Depends on the day.
They got rid of Hemphill who was railroaded for “declining enrollment” and now want him to become SBC Prez
Who is “they”?
In the 19th century, Southern Baptist women were not allowed to vote in denominational meetings. That changed in 1920, which also happened to be the year the 19th Amendment was ratified. So it’s not necessarily a bad thing when changes within the SBC coincide with shifts in the wider culture.
We live in a very interesting time in the SBC, when one day going along with the culture (likely an election day) is considered a virtue, while the next, following the culture’s cue to value women and protect them from abuse and harassment, is a vice.
Who exactly has argued that valuing and protecting women from abuse and harassment Is a vice?
I would like to know this as well.
No one. It’s possible you misunderstood my point when you copied and pasted that prepositional phrase out of my comment and ignored the context. The vice is “following the culture’s cue.”
Quite a few people on this blog, and significantly more if you add other SBC blogs and Twitter, are attributing the statements released by entity heads and the criticism of Paige Patterson to getting [quote] “swept up in the #MeToo movement” and “making all of our decisions based on the latest polls”. So some consider following culture’s cue is a bad thing (vice).
But I gave two examples that prove that the SBC sometimes views “going along with the culture” as a good thing (virtue). The 1920 suffrage movement and the 2016 presidential election.
So that aspect of the argument in defense of Dr. Patterson doesn’t hold up, according to Southern Baptists past and present.
I personally don’t think “evangelicals” following the culture in the 2016 election was a good thing at all.
Although, I didn’t say what you quoted above… Actually, I do think *following* the culture is a vice. We are instructed as Christians to be in the world but not of it. Our cues for morality and counseling should actually not be led by culture – but by the everlasting and steadfast word of God.
Yes. Christians have gotten it wrong from time to time over the years – but the problem was NOT a rejection of the culture – it was in fact the problem was an embracing of the world, resulting in attempts to force scripture into that motif.
I am not per se a member of SBC. My husband and I did attend an SBC church for 7 years mainly because we had children attending the school. I have to say it was the most dysfunctional church we have ever attended,. We ended up leaving because it was a toxic spiritual environment to our children and ourselves.
Since we left I have been following church abuse and dysfunction pretty closely.. There have many disturbing incidents in the last 18 months, but there are two that have not received much attention.
1. The coverup of Darrell Gilyard for so many years.
2. The stained glass windows in honor of Patterson and others. Come on guys. With all your bible knowledge, you can’t see the idolatry in all this.
“ Pride cometh before a fall and a haughty spirit before destruction .