I’ve been meaning to write about this for over a week, but life events have slowed me down. At least 8 state conventions issued resolutions condemning racism, white nationalism and white supremacy, and the Alt-Right and calling upon gospel unity at their annual meetings. With strong statements from Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, the SBC went beyond the Alt-Right Resolution in Phoenix at the national convention and applied this sentiment on the state level as well. I wonder if local associations will continue to make these statements as well?
Baptist Press had a great article on the developments. Read it to get a summary of most of the state resolutions.
Their write-up on the Alabama resolution is of particular interest to me, as I minister and live in Alabama:
– The Alabama convention, meeting Nov. 14-15 in Huntsville, resolved to “condemn every form of racism, including and specifically alt-right white supremacy and white nationalism, as antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”
It also said, “That as a witness to the sacrificial love of Christ for all people, we will oppose persecution and harassment of all racial and ethnic minorities, immigrants, refugees, and anyone else targeted by these white supremacist/nationalist groups.”
The messengers called for Baptist churches to “seek racial reconciliation in our respective communities across Alabama to show the power of the Gospel and to give respect, honor and love to one another and thus make known that we are His disciples.”
In addition, the resolution urged opponents of the “alt-right” — a movement that advocates white nationalism and/or supremacy — to use only “peaceful, non-violent means” in their protests.
The Virginia resolution also drew my eye, especially considering the events in Charlottesville in August:
— The SBCV, meeting Nov. 12-14 in Colonial Heights, addressed the August rally organized by the “alt-right” in Charlottesville, Va. Opponents of “alt-right” ideology gathered to counter protest, and violence ensued between the groups. One woman died when an “alt-right” protester drove a car into a crowd of counter-protesters. The messengers extended their “love and compassion of those in Charlottesville devastated by these events.”
The messengers also denounced “every form of nationalism that violates the biblical teachings with respect to race, justice, and ordered liberty.”
“[W]e will stand with ethnic minorities and anyone else targeted for intimidation so that the attempt to devalue our fellow image bearers results in a bold witness of the sacrificial love to which Christ calls us,” the SBCV said.
In addition, the resolution encouraged SBCV churches “to prayerfully consider increasing diversity among local church and denominational leadership.”
Tennessee Baptists recently took a strong stand against White Nationalists who gathered in Shelbyville, TN to protest immigrants and refugees who had come to the Middle Tennessee area. Their subsequent resolution should be deeply considered as well:
The resolution noted that:
— “God is bringing the nations to Tennessee and is making Tennessee home to more than 145 different global people groups” and that the TBC is “comprised of racially and ethnically diverse churches.”
— the Baptist Faith and Message 2000 affirms “Christ died for man; therefore, every person of every race possesses full dignity and is worthy of respect and Christian love.”
— Tennessee Baptists “are categorically opposed to all ideologies and movements of any race that diminish the dignity of any human being” and that they believe “one cannot be a devoted follower of Christ and harbor racism of any kind in one’s heart.”
— Tennessee Baptists “embrace Tennessee as a diverse mission field that God has called to reach through the fervent preaching of the gospel and acts of service to others, regardless of race or ethnicity,” pledging to “intensify our efforts to pray, give, and advance the Great Commission across the street to our closest neighbors and to the ends of the earth.”
The resolution exhorted Tennessee Baptists “to pray for the salvation of our neighbors regardless of race or ethnicity” and to pray “for our leaders and all who are in authority” as they make policy decisions related to issues of race (1 Timothy 2:2).
And the resolution called for Tennessee Baptists “to earnestly pray, both for those who advocate racist ideologies and those who are thereby deceived, that they may see their error through the light of the gospel, repent of these hatreds, and come to know the peace and love of Christ through the redeemed fellowship in the kingdom of God, which is established from every nation, tribe, people, and language.”
These resolutions are not just about black/white racism. They also recognize that White Nationalists are opposing immigrants and refugees and are fostering hate and division to be stirred up against ethnic minorities across the country. The Tennessee resolution did a great job of connecting the denunciation of White Nationalists to the positive affirmation of taking the gospel to the nations among us.
Recently, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary hosted the second annual Reaching the Nations in North America Conference. The focus was on how churches could reach immigrants and refugees who have come to live among us with the gospel. It was not lost on conference participants (I was there) that the same weekend that Tennessee Christians, including Southern Baptists, were standing against white supremacists who were marching against immigrants and refugees, in Shelbyville, TN, hundreds of other Southern Baptists were gathered at SEBTS to learn more about how to reach the nations who have come to dwell among us.
In addition, in October, the ERLC recently published a letter supporting the hundreds of thousands of Immigrant Dreamers whose DACA protection was revoked. The letter asks for legislation that would make a way for them to be able to earn legal status. They called this letter the Evangelical Leader Statement of Principles on Dreamers. One of the most powerful parts of the statement involves the concept of justice in regard to those brought here illegally as children and who have grown up here and have nowhere to go:
We believe it is unjust to punish children for offenses they did not commit. We recognize that Dreamers are a special category of immigrants because they broke no law and committed no offense. How we treat this category of immigrants is therefore not just a policy or political issue—it is a moral issue. Subjecting Dreamers to deportation or lives of perpetual insecurity in the shadows of our communities is an offense to the rule of law and to the purpose of government, which is for the good of people.
This is significant because it places the fate of Dreamers into the realm of a moral issue and a biblical justice issue and it declares that the rule of law is actually violated if these young people are deported or if they are not granted a pathway to citizenship. This is significant. The letter goes on to call for secure borders, for family stability, and for a pathway to legalized status and/or citizenship for Dreamers.
The letter is signed by a who’s who of Southern Baptist and Evangelical leaders. You can also sign your name to it, if you desire.
The issues of racism, white nationalism, white supremacy, the Alt-Right, and anti-immigrant and anti-refugee sentiment are all connected to fear of the “other.” Across the country, a growing number of people are fearful of the future and fearful of people of different cultures and ethnicities affecting their “way of life.” For most of my life, I lived under the idea that race relations were getting better and that America is a place that welcomes the immigrant and refugee. In the past few years, that illusion has been shattered and we are seeing division, anger, and fear grow.
In a speech in October, former president George W. Bush said, “We’ve seen nationalism distorted into nativism … Bigotry seems emboldened. Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication.” All over America, people of goodwill are recognizing that racial strife is growing instead of getting better. But, this is also a prophetic moment where the church can lead and point the way to the Cross of Christ and sacrificial love for neighbor and even enemy, or we can shrink back and grasp at protecting our own “way of life” over and against others.
The opportunity for gospel witness to the reconciling power of the Cross and the incredible love of Christ is greater than it has been in my lifetime. Our country is trying to figure out how to live together and get along, in the midst of our differences. The church can show the way. I’m proud that Southern Baptists have been doing just that, as this post demonstrates. With our tragic and shameful past regarding slavery and race relations, what if God displayed His incredible grace and mercy and redemption by using the Southern Baptist Convention to point the way to racial and ethnic healing and gospel welcoming of the immigrant, refugee, and the stranger?
What if God is using Southern Baptists to tell a better story? I think that is happening and I am glad.
Alan Cross is a long-time SBC pastor in Alabama who now serves as a Missional Strategist with the Montgomery Baptist Association and an advocate for ministry to immigrants and refugees across the Southeast. He is the author of When Heaven and Earth Collide: Racism, Southern Evangelicals, and the Better Way of Jesus (New South Books, 2014).
At the SBC of Virginia meeting, the committee took turns reading the resolution. After it was read, the room began to applaud and moved into a sustained standing ovation. It was a powerful moment. It passed unanimously without discussion after that. I’m really thankful for the strongly worded resolution the committee brought forward. Text can be found here, it’s the last one in the document: https://www.sbcv.org/wp-content/uploads/Annual-Homecoming-2017-Resolutions.pdf
The resolution at the Arkansas Baptist State Convention was a generic resolution denouncing racism and hate groups but not naming specific groups. Chase Crawford a young man who attended the SBC meeting in Phoenix presented an amendment quoting the SBC resolution stating, “”Whereas, Racism and white supremacy are, sadly, not extinct but present all over the world in various white supremacist movements, sometimes known as ‘white nationalism’ or ‘alt-right.'”
The chairman of our resolution committee got up and spoke against the amendment using arguments similar to those presented last summer by the SBC resolutions committee to oppose Dwight McKissic’s resolution. He said we couldn’t name all hate groups therefore we shouldn’t name any.
Atlhough I did not know beforehand Chase would present his amendment, I seconded it and spoke in favor of it. I felt that once it was presented it would not look good to reject something that the SBC approved, and it might look like we opposed the final statement at Phoenix. Evidently, I was not eloquent enough because the amendment failed. I was the only one who spoke in favor of it. Our resolutions are presented at the last hour of the convention and most messengers have already gone home. I believe the majority of people there did not know who the alt-right was or what they stand for. For example, one person speaking against the amendment said he had no problem with white supremacy being in the amendment, but he tended to lean a little alt-right himself and felt we should take that out. Of course, as we know, you cannot separate the alt-right from white supremacy.
I believe this misunderstanding is why we need to name the alt-right in these resolutions so that people will know what they stand for. The alt-right has nothing to do with left versus right or conservative versus liberal. It is an anti-Gospel racist organization that is anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi. There is no reason any Southern Baptist should hesitate to condemn it.
I am a proud Arkansas Baptist but I believe we dropped the ball on this resolution.
For some, maybe many, a clear definition of how those making the motion want the labels to be understood might be helpful in a room filled with more than three Souther Baptists.
For the man who said he leaned a little Alt Right… I would love to understand what he means by this, in context with how the motion is presenting it.
Yeah…that’s an issue.
The definition of the alt right is not settled or even commonly agreed upon…this seems an example of that.
I doubt (and would hope not) that A messenger in a state Southern Baptist convention gathering would mean “I lean racist” when he says into a microphone “I lean alt right” – in fact he stated that he rejects racism but leans alt right – this Demonstrates that to some these are separate.
Included in this tweet is the text of the Alabama Baptist resolution. It takes the resolution from the SBC and then goes in some specific directions.
https://twitter.com/alanlcross/status/930554214195126274
The Baptist Convention of New England also passed a similar resolution denouncing racism at our annual meeting in November.
http://www.bcne.net/connect/communications/news/media-archive/connection—november-2017/new-england-messengers-celebrate-next-generation,-denounce-racism
Great, Cory! Thanks!
Thanks for all the good efforts to confirm that Baptists in various states all condemn racism.
Ron, that is an interesting statement that you reported to be made by a messenger about him being alt-right but not a white supremacist.
I talked to a pastor recently who received a letter from a congregant saying the same thing.
Have you or others heard that before?
Bannon makes that claim Louis. He says he’s alt-right but not aligned with the racists.
I think it’s like saying, “I’m a Nazi, but only so the trains will run on time.”
Louis, I actually don’t think he was either. When people see the word right, they somehow think that implies the political right or the opposite of liberal. This person had no idea what alt-right meant. Actually liberals and conservatives both oppose the alt-right. I can’t understand why some people in our convention who do know the difference are still afraid to mention the alt-right in a negative way.
Very heartening to see these state conventions condemning racism and white supremacy groups.
And also to affirm that immigrants are to have the Gospel proclaimed to them.
Condemning sin and proclaiming the Gospel, especially to the’least’ among us is our mission. Politicking on the left or on the right is not.
Fully agree.
I think the danger with these kind of resolutions is that messengers can go home after voting for a resolution denouncing the alt-right, racism, etc. thinking that they have done their part–that they have actually accomplished something. They can pat themselves on the back thinking that they are in the midst of the struggle for reconciliation. I hope that everyone who votes for one of these resolutions or blogs about them is actively engaging in reconciliation in their own community. I hope that they are pursuing reconciliation by opening their homes to people who don’t look like them. I hope that they are willing to consider moving to ethnically diverse neighborhoods or sending their kids to ethnically diverse schools. I hope that they are pursuing deep relationships with people from different cultures and backgrounds so that they can have open and honest conversations about what reconciliation is and how it should be pursued. On SBC Voices there is a lot of talk about racial reconciliation statements and resolutions, I would prefer to hear more about how others are actually pursuing racial reconciliation beyond raising their hand in a convention meeting.
It’s great that all of these conventions are putting out resolutions but resolutions are not the answer. Who really thinks that anyone has ever changed their mind about a behavior, a belief or about the SBC itself because we put out a resolution? (Did anyone stop watching Disney movies or going to Disney World because of a resolution?–clearly not enough of us!) At the end of the day, I think we do it because it is cathartic–it makes us feel good about ourselves. If I were SBC king for a day, I would do away with the whole resolution process.
The premise of this is a complete false accusation.
You said, “On SBC Voices there is a lot of talk about racial reconciliation statements and resolutions, I would prefer to hear more about how others are actually pursuing racial reconciliation beyond raising their hand in a convention meeting.”
You obviously aren’t reading. Alan Cross is working tirelessly on this – with our full support. Brent Hobbs was in Washington DC last week (with Alan and a bunch of others) – there was an article in Baptist Press.
I do not discount the power of talk. Jesus was “the Word.” Words are powerful. But our group here is doing a LOT more than just talking.
Your point is NOT well taken.
Lee –
If what you are saying is that all we are doing is not enough so therefore we need to do more and in doing that share our journey – invite the masses to join – build upon what we are doing but do not let what we are doing ever be enough.
Then, I agree with you. The above is how I read your post. The SBC is doing much but the masses of the SBC count are doing little to nothing.