Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” And they divided up his clothes by casting lots. Luke 23:34
I have been told the church was mostly silent on that day. Evidence of my ongoing struggle with homosexuality was presented, a vote was taken and I was declared unfit to be a member and removed for the destruction of my soul. I was not there that night, but instead was angry and alone in the darkening end of a long and frightening day, as they proclaimed me unworthy of them. Oh . . . my soul. And all that is within me.
Since that fateful vote, I have not seen the faces or heard the voices of those present. No simple note, no gentle whisper of hope or reminder that a prayer has gone forth on my behalf. No follow-up. No Christmas card. No condolences on the burning of my home. Nothing. Separated with only a shred of hope for reconciliation somewhere in eternity.
And yet my soul remains secure. It was not destroyed, but was instead strengthened by the knowing that there is One, who was there that night, who is always with me, and who always will be. Who truly knows my soul.
I have re-invented the scene in my mind’s eye. Presumed which scriptures were cited. What examples of my betrayal of all-things-Christian given. I know the pain of my grown children was displayed to support the need for the harshest penalty possible for my sexual sin. And, like a late-night bogeyman emerging from behind a closet door with sword drawn, eyes glaring and lips pursed, they produced a greater fear than that inside me, a sharper pain than my own self-induced chaos: judgment. Shame. Rejection. Aloneness. Unworthiness.
And then, well, life pretty much returned to normal for all of us, each seeking God and each falling short, sometimes knowing what we were doing, but often not. And, as God does, He looked beyond their rejection and my self-revulsion and on to redemption and restoration, accepting my repentance.
I thought of them then as the bullies of the pulpit, bearing down on a witless victim already buried beneath the debris of his bad decisions. “Here . . . we’ll make this one for you. You’re outa’ here.”
Hateful bigots?
No.
Bewildered believers?
Yes.
I know now that many times we are unable to separate strugglers from embracers; those who fight and fall under the relentless pull of a never-wanted homosexual attraction, from those who wrap themselves in it in a shrill proclamation and flaunt it in the face of believers, bating a response they can declare as mean-spirited, damaging and destructive babble from an ill-informed hateful bigot. They build a bogeyman and feign fear so the cries can drown out the truth and stifle the motivation of compassion.
It is a useful myth for pro-gay advocates and, in its relentless repetition, it divides the Christian community and reduces us to lessening relevance. Some react with greater fervor, unleashing anger. Others wilt and move toward affirmation, all too willing to set aside the Word of God for peace. And some just no longer care. They go numb, surrender and adopt a code of silence.
How dare we?
Have we forgotten that behind the face of the loud and lost lies a heart that God longs for regardless of whether it longs for Him? Is our only choice to thicken the walls and batten down the hatches? Can we only put on the full armor of God to assume the attack mode? Are we to cover our eyes with hands which should be reaching?
The pro-gay agenda is making ground with the weapon of two simple words: hateful bigot.
“You don’t want me to be happy? You hateful bigot.”
“You don’t think I should marry my same-sex partner? You hateful bigot.”
“You believe in a God that thinks I sin just by being who He made me to be? You hateful bigot.”
“You say you love me and then quote your scriptures that condemn me? You hateful bigot.”
“You want me to be like you? You hateful bigot.”
“You drive me to suicide with your judgment and ignorance and bullying and your chains and you make me feel so unloved and rejected and put down . . . and, on top of that, you deny my civil rights and don’t want me to be proud of who I am . . . and you think you’re just better than me? You hateful bigot.”
Repeated over and over and over, the myth becomes, to some, a twisted reality. And while we will always have hate and we may always have bigots, they are remarkably few among bewildered believers.
And yet, we know that homosexuality is a sin and is destructive, as all sins are. Sins are indeed “evil” and can pollute the soul of the man to the point he becomes almost inseparable from the sin, clinging to it, justifying the clinging by claiming an identity. Outside the prying power of love, there seems no way to see inside that heart.
“An evil man is rebellious to the core. He does not fear God, for he is too proud to recognize and give up his sin. The words he speaks are sinful and deceitful; he does not care about doing what is wise and right. He plans ways to sin while he lies in bed; he is committed to a sinful lifestyle; he does not reject what is evil.” (Psalm 36:1-4).
Christians who are brave enough to love will find themselves surrounded by men and women who struggle with unwanted same-sex attraction and only want help in the rescue. Their lives hang in the balance and they are the softer targets of the hateful-bigot propaganda machine because they are like prizes waiting to be claimed. If pro-gay advocates can convince the silent struggler that you — the bewildered believer — are anxious to pounce on their revelation with the full wrath of religious fervor, marching to the beat of the resounding gong and the clanging cymbal, the pro-gay advocates can claim another casualty and you will lose another chance to help heal a soul.
We can’t afford this. We have no excuses. Even if your upbringing tells you that somehow the homosexual struggler is a lesser human being, a poster-child for “the least of these,” then you have a greater responsibility than ever, according to Christ. And, in risking a moment to move into his or her life, you may discover that that shipwrecked soul is destined by God to sail and do great things. He is every bit as valuable to His creator as you ever were or will be.
We have no excuse for hatefulness. It comes back to haunt us and diminish the impact we can have in the lives of those for whom hope lies just beneath a clouded surface. We have the truth and if we wield it skillfully, we can tear away the lies without destroying the person who has fallen for them.
What is the easiest way to kill a myth? Live the truth.
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” — Matthew 22:36-40
That’s the truth. We may not be able to change everyone, but we are not given the choice on whether we will love them. And if we love them, we may well change them, or, at the very least, present a better picture of a God who loves them . . . still.
Don’t feed the myth.
God Bless,
Thom
(If you would like to know more about how to encourage people who struggle with sexual brokenness, please buy a copy of my book, Surviving Sexual Brokenness: What Grace Can Do from Amazon.com or other sources.)
Okay, again, fascinating and powerful.
I love the way you break the molds of the out and proud homosexual and the hateful bigot in the pew.
But I have a question about this today. Two questions, really.
1) Am I reading you right that you believe that the church that brought you under discipline was wrong in what they did? Or perhaps how they did it? What did they do wrong, if indeed you believe they were wrong?
2) How should they have handled it, from your very unique perspective.
We want to stand strong against sin but also be redemptive toward sinners. I’m guessing you have some opinions based on experience as to how that should be done.
Thanks for your questions. I know this is a very difficult situation for churches.
I believe that, in my case, the church exercised church discipline because they knew not what else to do. That doesn’t necessarily make it wrong. I was sinning and it appeared to them that I was doing so willfully. I was confronted. I first denied. I then admitted. I fell again. They had plenty of evidence. That seemed sufficient for the hammer to fall. Based on that, they made a proper decision and exercised it correctly, to a certain point. Had they been willing to explore a little more deeply, I believe they would have come to the conclusion that I was seeking repentance and needed support and encouragement rather than rejection. I think churches should err on the side of any evidence of sincere repentance and show great patience and hold off on church discipline until it is clear it is the only remaining solution.
I do believe churches should follow-up with the disciplined one, particularly since the hoped-for result is repentance and restoration. That’s probably been the bigger issue in my case. There has been absolutely no attempt from anyone in the church leadership to find out how I am doing or whether the discipline was effective. There was no follow-up with my wife, who was also a member of the church. Follow-up is important not only for the one disciplined, but for the church members who bore the responsibility. I know the members did not undertake it lightly and it’s hard to see the leadership being so dismissive. Moving on and telling them to do also.
My case was a difficult one, I know. I had served as a deacon, an elder and a teacher in that church. I fell far below the higher standard expected. Several men within the same church came forward in the weeks following my dismissal and confessed their struggle with same-sex attraction. Because they did so, they received guidance and were directed to a ministry outside the church to help them. They did not undergo discipline. So, I am glad to see that some good perhaps came from my situation.
Strugglers need accountability, boundaries and a strong connection with other Christians. That’s what we should offer first, in hopes of redemption. Certainly many Christians who struggle with homosexuality do leave the church and look for false comfort elsewhere. I did not. I endured the discipline, worked through repentance, sought the redemption and restoration, received it through Christ, and joined another church. I’m not sure, under the circumstances of the church that disciplined me, that I would ever have been fully received there, even if forgiven . . . something I have no evidence to support having taken place.
Bottom line? I support church discipline. We just need to be very cautious in exercising it and we need to remember that the person we cast out is still a person, worthy of at least a follow-up call.
One question.
In what ways does a disciplining Church relate to the FAMILY of the person they are disciplining? And do they follow through with this pattern where ALL sin is treated similarly?
I remember a case of a man and his family, where the man admittedly disagreed with a pastor over many issues using a blog and a pseudonym. The pastor found out who he was and eventually banned him AND HIS WIFE from entering the Church, but their daughter was allowed to be in a choir, while her mother ‘waited in the parking lot’ for her.
How does a Christian community discipline a person in the context of their own family who is also a part of that Christian community?
What are the considerations concerning the FAMILY of the person that the Church is disciplining ?
Sorry, that turned out to be more than one question.
Christiane,
I can only reflect what happened in my family’s case. My children were all adults at the time. Three of my sons and my daughter attended the church and continued to do so. At least of my sons and his wife still do.
My wife was not asked to leave the church, at first. She had many friends there and while she moved her membership with me, she continued to fellowship with her friends and for a couple of years attended a Precept Women’s bible study there. She went to a couple of women’s retreats with the women of the church. However, eventually she was approached by an elder who told her her presence was disruptive and made someone uncomfortable, although she never discussed the church discipline issue. He asked her to stop coming and she did. She has many friends in the church we joined.
For a short period of time, one of the church leaders was helpful to our daughter, our youngest, as she adapted to the situation.
I was the only one officially disciplined. However,my childrenwere told that, as members of the church, they should not interact with me.
I think you are absolutely right, Thom. Discipline is a last resort and we should err on the side of redemption, forgiveness and restoration.
I understand. And I’m not sure what else to say.
I appreciate your view, and it is certainly a better view than mine coming from the inside. I have a differing view, though and would like to offer my take:
I know that not every Church or Christian who would want to offer correction is a bigot. There are loving believers who genuinely want to help. I just don’t believe that it was the case in your particular situation or in the majority of any of similar situations.
I believe this for two reasons:
1. The church promotes homosexuality as a sin worse than all others. If it had been discovered that last year you did not file your taxes (and thus not giving to Caesar what is Caesar’s) and plan to do the same this year (which is repeating the sin) I am 99.9 % sure that the same disciplinary actions would not have been taken. I believe this behavior to be picking and choosing scripture at best, and bigoted at worst.
2. The Bible does make room for Discipline within a church body. However, what your situation sounds like does not seem to be a “last resort because we’ve tried everything else” type of discipline. It sounds like someone gathered evidence and then the church decided there was no way that was gonna fly in their church with all the “normal” people. How can there be healing if there is no support from the church body? That’s the purpose of a church.
I appreciate your views, as I am neither someone who struggles with same sex attraction nor have I been through a church discipline process, but I disagree with your premise here. The Hateful bigot is no boogeyman in the church. I have seen them and met them and have attended church with them in the past.
Brandon,
Actually, I do agree with you that the “hateful bigot” does exist within the church, and I, like you have met them and fellowshipped with them. I just don’t believe that we can paint the church with a broad brush, as I know many people who are not like that, but perhaps behaved more as modeled by some of the church leaders, who should know better.
Many members will not challenge the direction set by leadership. The truth is, most churches have someone or several in their church who struggle silently, fearing that making their secret known, even in hopes of finding help, could destroy their lives. I know that what happened to me probably silences a number of men and women who were in my position and drove them further into secrecy. Even the two who came forward were college-age single men and it was a little easier for the leadership to accept and work with them.
The bogeyman is there, yes, but it is our fear of him that allows him to have a greater impact than he should, elevating him above truth.
Are you saying, Brandon, that Thom was perhaps treated differently because his sin was same-sex instead of heterosexual?
I would guess that the church might tend to be harsher with a person who commits homosexual sin. That would be unjust but probably fairly normal.
I agree with the notion that same-sex sins are likely to be punished more harshly than a hetersexual sin.
I wanted to wait for Thom’s response before I jumped in. There’s a lot that I’d like to say, but I’ll try to keep this brief.
1) I don’t believe church discipline was warranted here (at least not expulsion). In 1 Cor. 5 Paul seems to only argue for that man’s expulsion because there was no “struggle” and no repentance. In fact, he says that the church itself, for whatever reason, boasted in what was happening. Still, Paul’s ultimate goal was “that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.” Discipline should always have a redemptive goal. However, we so seldom practice it that we don’t often do it well. I think we are also afraid that the church will become the “sin police” and that any one of us could be next in line once the ball gets rolling. But if the church is a redemptive place rather than a judgmental one, I’m convinced these things can be done right.
2) I think this is also a place where the church needs to show greater consistency. As soon as I saw the issue involved I immediately knew where the post was going: to church discipline. It seems that we are willing to practice church discipline, even imperfectly, when it comes to sexual sins and particularly homosexuality. But 1 Cor. 5 lists, along with sexual sins, the sins of greed, reviling and swindling. When was the last time someone was brought under church discipline for being unrepentantly greedy or verbally contemptuous? I’ve known people throughout my life who explain these things away with the phrase, “That’s just the way I am,” and the church usually accepts that. Yet, we’d never accept that from someone who claimed that about their homosexuality. I think too often we judge one another according to our own standards rather than God’s and it makes us hypocrites.
I agree with what you say, Paul, but I’m a little cynical too. I’m gonna hold my breath and wait for a church to discipline greed and “reviling” like it does sexual sin. My wife will be a wealthy widow soon.
Thom,
I think I agree completely. I’ve sinned in other ways myself (haven’t we all?), and no more than grace was easy for Christ is it ever easy for us. It shouldn’t be. Nevertheless, we should look for opportunities for grace without compromising the principles of scripture.
I had roommates in the military and college who were homosexual. They weren’t Christian, and at one point I wasn’t much of one. So I learned to see the sin for what it was even though I desired that they could see their own sin so they could repent of it. My heart ached for them.
Conversely, I was in a church in another denomination where homosexuals were, dare I say, intentionally infiltrating the denomination to destroy it. These were some I ministered alongside gladly before I knew the truth of their status and the depths of their deception. The denomination has been split and plundered. You can’t con an honest man, so their tactic merely played on the sin of liberal unfaithfulness that was already poisoning the denomination. I saw it coming, but chose to stick around if only to teach truth to the last moment to those who needed truth.
But I’ve seen, perhaps, both ends of the spectrum. Church discipline, where necessary (and it’s more often necessary that many practice it), is fairly pointless without the love to recognize repentance. The goal is always eventual reconciliation and it saddens me when that is not the case. Thom, they should have had you present if at all possible so they could issue terms of reconciliation given in all love. God sought our reconciliation before we even knew to repent. That should be our pattern. And once terms are met – 70 times 7 – we should be quick to forgive and welcome a brother parted in sin to be reconciled in repentance. And in the meantime, where possible, brothers and sisters should be available to help with loving accountability where needed and wanted.
Thom, I’m glad to know you, albeit remotely, here on this side of the struggle.
Good comment. And I agree that Thom is really doing the church a service with his writings.
Jim,
I think I know which denomination you are referring to. Unfortunately, the infiltration technique has worked in a couple of them and those denominations are in decline.
I think we’re also seeing a shift among pro-gay advocates. For years they tried to say that God and the Bible do not acting on homosexual temptation is a sin. Now they’ve grown bolder and have moved away from that argument and usually just openly declare that God does not exits and the Bible is a volume of mythology. That new position, I believe, has grown strength because churches have remained relatively silent because of a lack of education on the topic of homosexuality. It’s not one of those things that we can ignore in hopes it will go away. We need to learn the truth and share it with compassion.
I enjoy reading Mr. Hunter’s posts on this topic. I think we can all appreciate his transparency and honesty.
I especially found this post interesting in light of recent developments concerning gay rights within the context of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Repeal policy.
I’m curious as to how Mr. Hunter views the recent DADT repeal?
Under the DADT, Christians in the military were unable to be open and honest with their fellow Christians whom they served with about their struggles with same-sex attraction. The DADT policy actually ensured the silence and dialogue that Hunter desires more Christians to participate in.