Many people groups around the world are what ethnologists term oral learners. As the Orality Strategies website defines orality…
“‘Orality’ refers to reliance upon the spoken, rather than written, word for communication.Orality is an ancient phenomenon that continues to the present. Before writing was developed, cultures passed along their cultural traditions, including their history, identity, and religion, through their stories, proverbs, poems, songs, riddles, etc. These are all oral art forms; that is, they are spoken, sung or chanted. They were (and still are) often woven into ceremonies, dramas and rites of passage. Purely oral societies pass along everything that matters from one generation to another without putting anything into writing. They rely on the spoken word (including its sung and chanted forms).”
Simply put, oral learners do not typically utilize print to learn or share information. They teach and learn primarily through narrative recollection and sharing. If they wish to learn about crocodiles, someone shares experiences and lessons through narration, possibly with a follow-up commentary. If someone needs to understand the Gospel, stories communicate more clearly than a series of individual verses that formulate a collective point.
Recently, my wife and I have been formulating a new story set that teaches the character of God as a precursor to introducing our need for a relationship with Him. We lack the luxury of a highly-motivated group of learners, so we’ve limited ourselves to five stories that the people can learn in five lessons. Here’s our basic process:
1. Identify what our people group believes about God; is He creator? Just? Loving? Far or near? Limited?
2. Identify the characteristics that they have accurately grasped.
3. Identify the beliefs about God that are inconsistent with reality.
4. Choose five stories that together end up addressing the fundamental beliefs about God that are inconsistent with reality.
These stories cannot possibly address everything there is to know about God, of course. We aim to address basic misunderstandings about Him, things that stand between our people and a basic grasp of their need for salvation. As well, these are stories, self-contained narrative sections of the Bible that demonstrate God’s character.
As the United States becomes more ethnically diverse, churches stand to encounter more oral learners than ever before. If pastors and Bible teachers maintain their current approach to teaching (verse by verse, or a collection of verses), they risk failing to reach an unchurched population with the gospel.
So – your homework:
1. Assume your teaching reaches non-literate learners.
2. Identify the ways the unchurched in your area fail to understand the character of God.
3. Choose the primary misunderstood characteristics of God you feel are necessary for a foundational understanding of salvation.
4. Choose five stories that address this need.
Remember – stories only! No “stories plus several other passages that support the idea” are permitted. No collection of verses will work. You can’t appeal to Greek or Hebrew in your lesson. Neither can you choose stories that rely on data contained in stories you’ve not yet shared. Choose Old Testament or New. Make the stories long or short.
However, you must memorize the stories, so don’t pick the 10 Plagues unless you can memorize them all, including the dialogue. If you consistently return to your printed Bible while teaching, you’ll end up communicating to your non-literate people that literacy is necessary for salvation. As well, your memorization needs to be pretty close to the print. There’s always one literate guy in the group who will look up the passage and compare it to your spoken words.
Share with us the characteristics you believe people are overlooking and then list the stories you’d theoretically use for instruction.
Come on – let’s impress each other!
“If pastors and Bible teachers maintain their current approach to teaching (verse by verse, or a collection of verses), they risk failing to reach an unchurched population with the gospel.”
Why do you think verse by verse fails to reach unchurched people? Calvary Chapel has been doing it for years with strong results among the unchurched.
Jim
First Baptist Church of Sunnyvale Trailer Park
I apologize if my point was not clear. In the future, as the US becomes more and more ethnically diverse, the odds of encountering oral learners will increase. It is these learners who stand to be left behind, people who do not use (or are uncomfortable using) print as a learning tool. There is absolutely nothing wrong, as I’m sure you know, with breaking down passages verse by verse. Unfortunately, that is a highly literate approach that leaves oral learners out of the loop. Thus, our need here on the field to use a storying-based approach. Honestly, I think the… Read more »
As an expositor of God’s Word, I find this a struggle as well. However, there are places and people who will likely not listen to my finely honed (go with me here, guys) expositions for the reasons Ethan mentioned.
It’s not so much that they would not listen as it is they would not understand. Breaking things down to the sentence, clause, and word level would make little sense. Narration of relationships and actions and the words that accompanied them is what makes sense since that how oral learners share and process information.
it looks like you are asking folks to put aside ‘theological complexities’ and give a narrative . . . like we would do with a young child who was not yet ready to comprehend the abstract, but can ‘picture’ the story you are telling them so that it has meaning for them therein lies the difficulty: so much of revelation is ‘paradox’, which not even the greatest theologians of our time fully comprehend, because there is in it that which we are not designed to fully grasp, but which brings us to the edge of our limits to look beyond… Read more »
I give you
THE WISDOM OF LINUS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRrWo2kSUiY
I am a “both and type” of guy here. Expository, YES. Orality and Storying , YES. But there are those who I deal with for which expository is the ONLY WAY !
So my question is ( ANd this is a sincere question cause I do not know) : Is there any place in the bible an expository sermon is done as an example, or a place that says we have to do it that way , ONLY ? I am not aware of one but again I am not as well trained as others on this site.
Jeremy: It strikes me that the homework you give fits more to what I term “Clarifier” ministry than Teaching ministry. Teaching can be primarily one-way – it seeks to communicate some body of information to those hearing. Clarifying seeks to clarify what is under- or mis-understood in those hearing. It presumes that the ‘students’ have already had teaching in some way. The primary difference is the ability to listen ; you can Teach without being able to listen to people well (though I maintain that that lack will hinder the ability to listen to scripture well); You *cannot* be a… Read more »