The next When Heaven and Earth Collide podcast interview is up with Dr. Danny Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. Dr. Akin and I have a wide-ranging conversation about how loving and ministering to immigrants coming to America relates to Scriptural commands involving the Great Commission and loving our neighbor. Dr. Akin calls upon Christians to engage immigrants with the gospel, with service and sacrificial love, and to put aside fear of others and trust Christ in what God is doing in the people movements around the world.
I asked Dr. Akin what he thought should be done about immigrants who are here illegally – if he could change the laws to address this situation, what would he do? He referred to both the previous head and current heads of the ERLC, Richard Land and Russ Moore. He says that both claim that a safe, wise, compassionate path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants is what Christians should advocate for. He reiterates that we should seek something safe, legal, and compassionate for undocumented immigrants. He doesn’t want the path to be hard. It should be easier than many would try to make it. While some would want to throw the borders open (he rejects that view) and some would shut the door completely (he rejects that as well), he said that we should try and juggle the balance between the two and develop a solution that incorporates safety and compassion. He said that the believes that this would be the Christ-like response to this situation.
Dr. Akin then said that “We want to love the nations well whether they are ten thousand miles away or right across the street.”
This was an inspiring and informative interview. I am grateful for Dr. Akin joining me and for his perspective. I see pastors and churches all over the country pivoting to engage the immigrants in their midst who have come to them with the gospel and advocacy. It is because of leadership of men like Dr. Akin that this message is getting out and changing churches and communities.
Check out the Dr. Danny Akin interview here.
Resources/Examples
A further example on what churches and associations can do can be seen in the North Carolina convention with their People’s Next Door North Carolina initiative. We are trying to launch a similar initiative in Alabama and I am hearing that other state conventions are considering efforts along the same lines. Much of this will be discussed at the upcoming Reaching the Nations in North America Conference in Brentwood, TN, August 26-27.
Good to hear a sensible voice on this.
Alan: I am so glad you are doing programs like this. You and Marty are doing a excellent job in my opinion and something so needed, especially in this age.
Ignoring for a moment the call for compassion in this interview, which I believe overrides our legal concerns towards sojourners…but more on that in a moment, the economic issues we are facing that cause either an influx or an outflow of immigrants mostly depend on two perceptions (by potential immigrants):
1. America (still) stands for Liberty. I have an acquaintance who is here from Turkey. He recognizes the distinction between the current conditions and is working hard to (legally) immigrate specifically for all of the variations of liberty that are possible here.
2. Our number of visitors that enter without documentation or stay longer than their entry visa permitted typically is proportional to the demand for labor. After the recession many returned home. Often, in fact, our free trade agreements (like NAFTA) create economic liberty and opportunity which is one of the reasons free trade is important.
The emphasis in the OT on sojourners does include them adopting the way of life of the nation. We need to recognize in the US it is extremely rare for the second generation of immigrants to not be fluent in English as a first language IF the family is included in the community. We ought to consider what kind of public policy in a pluralistic society mimics the biblical pattern.
But, mainly, when they’re on your doorstep I expect the leading of the Holy Spirit to guide us in how to interact and if that happens I’m not sure who we argue with when we dislike those divine appointments God arranges for us. Are we hoping the federal government will override God’s specific, individual call? And have we never considered the possibility that the other person might be dealing with a divine appointment as well?
Our greatest mission field is still our local community. If we do not reach them, we don’t make up for that somewhere else. Or, framed a little differently “As you go, make disciples.”
Good points, all, Greg. Yes, the OT mandate in on welcoming sojourners who seek to integrate and become a part of the host people. That is necessary and usually happens by the second generation. It will happen a lot faster if churches engage.
Once again, Akin is a clear minded and erudite voice in our cooperative community. However, some thoughts and questions:
Why assume that opposition to illegal immigration is motivated by fear? It would be just as misguided to assume that promotion of illegal immigration is motivated by love. In either case, some wholly other motivation may be at work.
The idea that evangelicals should celebrate immigration on the grounds that it enables the spreading of the Gospel is strange to me. By far, more people have immigrated to the US from Mexico than any other country since 1986. Several studies, reported in places like the New York Times, strongly indicate that Mexican immigrants are just as likely to be religious unaffiliated as natural born American citizens. Maybe the idea is that is someone who lived in Tijuana is more likely to hear and receive the Gospel if they live in America? I’m suspicious of this premise. If I’m not mistaken, some of the most explosive growth of Christianity has occurred in “closed countries” like China. The religion of secularism, if you will, appears to be more effective in reaching immigrants in America than American Christians: In fact, immigrants report having being more religious in their home countries. But also, while I’m no missiologist, isn’t the idea of the Great Commission that we go to them?
There is much talk about “neighbor love” in the immigration discussion. The assumption seems to be love = immigration. But this begs the question: How do we best love our neighbor? My own sense is that if we really love our neighbors in places like India, Mexico, etc. then Christians should pursue and promote a foreign policy and economic policy that addresses the issues that lead to immigration in the first place. Moreover, we have layers of neighbors worth considering. What about our neighbors currently living in the United States who are negatively affected by the influx of immigration? Do we love them by supporting an industrial revolution era influx of immigration in a post industrial age? Surely not.
WIth peace and love,
-Mox