(Due to chatting tendencies, I came in during this address! Sorry, Dr. Allen. Blame Leo Endel!)
2. The Seminaries must about training pastors and leaders for SBC ministry .
3. SBC Seminaries must develop a sustainable business model. “Don’t do stupid stuff.”
That is not enough.
Educational costs are getting out of hand, as are recruiting costs. Recent IMB downsizing is a warning to all.
Surely we did not spend decades fighting to avoid forfeiting our seminaries theologically to simply forfeit them financially.
4. We must determine to be agile and adaptable.
New technologies.
5. We must exist to serve Southern Baptist Churches.
Our seminaries do not exist just for scholarship, but as a means of preparing the leaders.
6. We must determine to prioritize the M. Div.
It has long been the gold standard and that is well-deserved. In some seminaries the M. Div has fallen on hard times. The M. A. has become popular because of the online accreditation. The M. Div offers what a pastor needs and settling for an MA simply for expedience is not good.
It’s not enough to simply know a little more than the biblically illiterate of our era.
7. We continually demonstrate a prima facie case for continued existence.
The lost need more than shallow answers from ill-equipped ministers.
8. We must determine to celebrate enrollment in terms of strength, not primarily size.
As SBs, we tend to like big. But the future may bring smaller, but we must take them deeper. We must judge by how many qualified pastors we are developing for Southern Baptist churches.
9. Missed its.
Care more about the gospel and the truth than the institution.
10. We must determine for the overall SBC project to be more important than any individual ministry.
You cannot have six healthy SBC seminaries without a healthy SBC.
This may be a “golden era” of theological education in the SBC, but present success does not guarantee the future.
Again, I am taking notes and trying to summarize.
My notes are not a literal rendering of the words of the speaker. At times, my accuracy may not be perfect. To say the least.
Education can be over-rated, if one considers the benefits of illumination or the gift of ministry. However, illumination or the gift of ministry can be over-rated, too, leading to eccentric and even bizarre events and experiences. Interestingly enough, a focus on either one or the other can lead to the same doctrinal aberrations. I found in the history of Southern Baptists that dependence upon illumination for example, within a hundred and thirty years or so led to a doctrine of no hell and no bodily resurrection. This I found in Primitive Baptist History, and at that time Southern Seminary had Nels Ferre to deliver some lectures. He held practically the same views as the Primitive Baptist elder who expressed to me in the sixties the idea that there was no hell and no resurrection.
The original doctrine was not an either/or but a both/and. In other words, God uses both education and illumination in His call and employment of His ministers. The Bible says study, and it also calls upon the minister to stir up the gift. The Puritans use to have a list of contrarieties, and the Baptist doctrine of ministerial qualifications is one of those contrarieties. We need and must use both study and the gift in our service. God bless.