I have done a daily devotional for my church for the last two years, encouraging them to read the Bible. I use the popular format of an OT reading, one from the NT, and a selection from Psalms and Proverbs each day. I work (at least) a day ahead and so I was working on tomorrow’s reading this morning. The NT reading is 1 Peter 3. Did you know that God gave Peter a vision of the future when social media would take over and a prophetic word for those of us who engage in it?
Of course, I’m kidding. People don’t change. I am a little skeptical (perhaps its my old codger reflex kicking in) when I hear about GenX, Millennials, Baby Boomers, etc.. ad infinitum, ad nauseum. People are people. Each generation doesn’t become a whole new genus. I understand that things are different today – the breakdown of the home and many social structures, the rise of media, other powerful influences have affected people. My wife is a preschool teacher – I hear the stories! But at the root, people are people. What was true about human beings in Peter’s day is true about us today.
My Social Media Struggle
In 1 Peter 3:8-22, He gave an instruction that hit me squarely between the eyes. I am glad social media didn’t happen in my younger days – I’d be one of those young whippersnappers who wakes up when they turn 35 and wishes he could erase all the stupid things he said in his youth. I’ve said plenty of them in my 50s, but if this outlet had been around in my hotheaded 20s I’d have to change my name and become a New Tribes missionary.
It is a struggle – that elusive unity thing. I’ve always wanted to be a force for unity in the SBC, but I’m also a hothead, emotional, passionate. Blogging has been “very, very good to me.” But it has also been a constant spiritual struggle. Many start blogging as firebrands and one of two things happens. Either then burn out and walk away in bitterness (that list is LONG!) or they cool down and become productive bloggers. When you look back at the Wild West days of Baptist blogging, some of the more irascible names of that time are now men of reason, leaders in the SBC, people who are making a positive contribution to the Southern Baptist family.
Every once in a while I go back and look at old posts and old comments steams and I both laugh and want to cry a little – at my own silliness. I remember a post I wrote in response to someone else and I look back on it now and I understand what he was trying to say and how I misunderstood him back then. We eventually worked through things and became friends and he’s out of the blogging game, but I see so many misunderstandings, harsh words, silly conflicts. But I also love blogging. I think it has had a positive effect on the SBC (don’t ask some of our leaders to admit that!) and it has certainly been a good test for my character and growth. It has also been a spiritual challenge, especially as I learned to deal with criticism.
I have always had trouble responding to criticism. Normally, I handle it pretty well when it is being given – God has often given me that grace to listen to people as they rail against my abundant inadequacies. It is afterwards that the trouble sets in. Sometimes it is anger; sometimes it is paralyzing sorrow or depression. I used to call them my “fetal position” days – when all I wanted to do was curl up on my bed in a ball and block out the world. I either wanted to strike back or withdraw completely. If you have been involved in blogging very long, you know what I’m talking about. None of us particularly likes to be criticized, bashed, persecuted, blamed, railed against, or in any other way spoken ill of, do we?
In 2003 I began an email blast called “WORD Processing” in which I sent out devotionals on a semi-regular (I think that is another word for sporadic) basis. God blessed it far beyond my expectations and a couple of my emails got picked up and sent around the world by other email blasts. I was amazed. I received thank you notes from people everywhere who read what I had written and were blessed by it. But I also received a couple of notes criticizing what I had said. “Take me off your list.” “That was not biblical.” I’m not sure what the ratio was, but the affirmation was much greater than the criticism. Guess what happened to me? You got it the first time. Fetal position! I let this blessing from God, this opportunity from heaven, die because I couldn’t handle a few words of criticism from some people I didn’t even know! I crumbled like an old cookie.
Then, blogging happened. I started posting some comments, started my own blog (read by at least a dozen people!), then got invited to join one of the more active blogs (sbcIMPACT) as a writer, and pretty soon I was involved here at SBC Voices. Along with that came…one guess…yep! Criticism. This time it was harsh and mean-spirited – much more so than I’d ever gotten from the email blast. By articulating the positions I’ve taken, I’ve incurred the wrath of one state executive who called me a “fraud,” many discernment blogs who didn’t like the fact that I have challenged the tone of SOME of the discernment blogs, and several others who feel my positions or criticisms have been unfair. Sometimes, the criticisms have probably been fair. Sometimes, I maintain they have not been.
What I have noticed is a distinct change in my heart through the years. It was a good change at first, but in recent months I’ve been wondering if I’ve gone too far. I began by growing a thicker skin. If you don’t have a thick skin, don’t blog (or even comment). If you can’t handle someone disagreeing with you, this isn’t for you. I don’t know if Bart will demand an apology and a retraction for this, but I consider him a very good friend. We are traveling to Senegal for the second time soon – I’m hoping to engage a UUPG that he put me in touch with after his church (and their absolutely amazing work with the Bayot people. Through the years, Bart and I have been on different sides of most of the blogging controversies. Baptist Identity – anyone remember that one? We’ve had some humdinger arguments. (He was always wrong, but he’s smarter than me, so he seems to win the arguments!) Learning to disagree, to be disagreed with, to be challenged – that is one of the blessings of blogging.
Even being criticized has been a blessing. I have several good friends in blogging who once I exchanged some pretty harsh blows with. And I’ve developed a much thicker skin about criticism. I no longer go into fetal position when someone writes an article calling me an idiot. I don’t like it. It often seems unfair. I’ve had outright lies published about me at pretty active blogs. It still hurts. Mostly, I’ve learned to ignore those things. I don’t read those blogs (though my “friends) are often good at linking me to them) and don’t respond to them. No point in it. But I’ve learned to live with the fact that people hate me, that they say terrible things about me, that they slander me. If you are going to blog and articulate a position, you can count on the fact that SOME who disagree with your position will go negative. That’s the nature of the game.
But recently I’ve been wondering whether I’ve allowed my heart to go too far in the other direction. I need a thicker skin, but I didn’t need a hard heart! There is a fine line, a narrow place in the middle of the road that we have to walk to avoid the ditches on either side. I cannot be fearful of the opinions of others, but neither ought I to put myself beyond critique. I should neither be weak or hard. I must find that sweet spot that Peter described in this passage. He was constantly accused falsely, beaten, imprisoned, and suffered extensively for loving Jesus and serving him. In 1 Peter 3:8-22, he gives a powerful and humanly impossible attitude toward suffering, criticism, and hostility from others.
Please understand – this is supernatural. It is the character of Christ infused into us. It is interesting that even in the Christian world, in the blogging world, many will disdain these attitudes as weak, as namby pamby. But the words of Peter match the words of Paul – and reflect the character of Christ. This is Spirit-filled living, enabling the character of the indwelling Christ to be seen in us. It is something only Christ can do, but it is not optional equipment. It is the command of God for us.
Peter’s Philosophy toward Criticism and Suffering
1. He establishes the basis for all of this, the work of Christ on the cross, where he suffered unjustly and redemptively. This is the conclusion of the passage, but is the foundation of everything written here. Look at verse 18.
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit.
We use that verse in evangelistic situations (as well we should), but Peter was establishing here that our sufferings are a reflection of the work of Christ. As Christ suffered for our sins to bring the unrighteous to God, we should be willing to suffer in the name of Christ to accomplish the work of Christ in this world. As Jesus said repeatedly in his teachings, it is only our suffering “for righteousness sake” that is blessed. I cannot suffer for being a jerk and expect to be rewarded by God!
But for the glory of God and for the work of Christ, I ought to be willing to suffer injustice, false accusation, slander, and anything else that is thrown at me. If I suffer because I am insufferable, there is no reward, but if I suffer because I speak the word of Christ and others don’t like it, because I uphold truth when others want to promote compromise, then the blessing of God attaches to that suffering and I must be willing to endure it – without answering back, without justifying myself, or attacking the other person.
Please understand – I’m bad at this and so are you. This is Jesus stuff and only by walking in the fullness of the Spirit will Jesus stuff become you stuff.
2. His core command is in verses 8-9. While the entire passage is worth meditating on, absorbing, ruminating on deeply, the heart and soul of it is verses 8 and 9.
Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind. Do not repay evil for evil or reviling for reviling, but on the contrary, bless, for to this you were called, that you may obtain a blessing.
Here’s the simple and unfortunate fact – these character qualities that Peter admonishes us to pursue are disdained by many in the church as signs of spiritual compromise and weakness. What does it say about us when we disdain Christlikeness? But that is not the issue, is it? The real issue is what does it say about me when I ignore these things and go on about my ministry?
- Unity, sympathy and brotherly love are real biblical values.
Of course, unity is based around Christ, but we must not use that as a dodge. There is no need to admonish us to unite with those who agree with us about everything. The command to unity is that we would seek to build unity with those with whom we disagree (as long as the disagreement is not on fundamental issues – the gospel, the nature of God, Christ, the Bible, etc – see my book Brick Walls, Picket Fences – shameless self-promotion). It is Baptist Calvinists and those of other soteriological positions coming together around the work of Christ and the gospel. It is people with differences valuing unity more than our camps, more than victory. It is a commitment to kindness and respect to the others – affirming their brotherhood even as we disagree with their positions.
This is not unity without standards – doctrinal or personal. But this is recognizing that in the Bible, unity is one of the highest standards God sets, and in the Body of Christ it is far more important than many of the things we cherish and divide over!
- Tender heartedness and humility are commands of God.
Christians are to be servants – viewing the needs of others as even more important than our own (Philippians 2). We are to see ourselves as the paupers among the royalty, not striving for supremacy but seeking to elevate others instead. This quality is lost when the blog wars heat up, isn’t it?
But the word that intrigues me is “tender hearted.” That is what I’ve lost. Through years of battles, scar tissue develops and the tenderheartedness goes away. There are people in the SBC and in the blogging world whom I see as enemies of the work of God in our denomination. I do not come to that designation easily and it must never be because of how they have treated me. But I’ve seen people do some evil things without repentance and we must be willing to stand against evil men (or women – equal time, ladies) who do evil things among us. But we must not lose our tender hearts in doing it.
That is a balance I struggle with. I can articulate it – force people to MAKE you designate them as enemies of the work of God. Don’t consign people to the “bad guy” list just because they question you, disagree with you, or even challenge you. If I do that, I am committing an act close to blasphemy – putting myself in the place of Christ. But when someone hurts the Body, hurts Christ’s people, sins egregiously and unrepentantly, organizes others to sin – there is a time and place to see that person for what he or she is. But somehow, we have to do that without losing our tender spirits.
It is a balance I struggle with. When I began, I was too tender. I think I’ve lost that. I’m trying to become tender again without losing doctrinal or behavioral standards – we must never tolerate sin or aberrant doctrine that undermines the gospel. It’s a tightrope walk that I’ve not quite mastered. Maybe you have some help for me?
- Don’t repay evil for evil – the best strategy.
This! If I’ve learned one thing in my decade, it’s that generally, the best thing to do is not to answer an attack. If someone has a question, answer them. If someone disagrees with you, answer (if you can, if you have time). But when the twitter terrorists start in, when someone “calls you out”, the best thing to do is either a) nothing or b) a private response (without anger – that’s hard for me too). If you’ve been around, you’ve witnessed a spectacle of mudslinging between two sides concerning a very controversial public figure (who shall remain nameless). Each side hurled epithets at the other. Each side challenged the other’s sanity, reason, and eventually Christianity. Each side anathematized the other. And, in my humble but correct opinion, the church of Jesus Christ did not profit an iota from the conflict. No minds were changed, no spirits were edified, but a lot of people were dragged down.
Sometimes, if you let things cool down, then talk to the person, you can work things out. Sometimes you can’t. That’s why Romans 12 says, “as much as is in you, live at peace…” The old adage says, “Never ‘rassle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.” Godly people hate to fight and only do it when they have to, for the honor of the Savior. Fleshly people love the conflict and would rather fight than unify. Our job is to repay good for evil, to refuse vengeance, to love our enemies.
If we claim we are defending the Bible, we’d better live it out! No sense defending inerrancy or biblical doctrine if we are going to simply ignore the teachings of the word – love, servanthood, unity, love your enemies, forgive one another, bear with one another. If we consign those to weakness and doctrinal compromise, or if we redefine those as only applicable to those who agree with us about everything, then we have done as much damage to the word as any liberal ever could!
3. The goal in all of this is verse 16. Peter tells us to live lives of such holiness and love that when people do slander us, they are the ones who are shamed for their slander. You and I need to be such men (and women) of God that when people write or say negative things about us there is no need to defend ourselves. Look at verse 16.
…having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame.
Wouldn’t that be amazing? To walk in holiness and love in such a way that when someone tries to skewer me, he is put to shame by his own accusations! That is the goal. And even if I do suffer because of such slander, verse 17 tells us that it is good to suffer for doing good.
There is much more in this passage than I can speak to right now. This has already become much longer than I intended, but as long, perhaps, as you expected. In my decade of blogging, I have failed these standards regularly. In the future, I will likely fail them again. But they are a biblical goal, a biblical standard that must not be discounted. May this be in my life and in yours, our noble and godly goal.
If you write a devotional 365 times each year, you are my hero. That, on top of the considerable other pastoral responsibilities, is awesome.
I once wrote personal birthday greetings to each individual in my congregation (the ones I had an address for and that I was pretty sure they weren’t dead), a number that came to well below 365. That took some steady work, even though I had a secretary to do everything but write the note and sign the cards.
You are a good example for SBC pastors…at least for the rest of today.
Well, to be honest, I’ve done it for two years, but if you look at the two years, I’ve copied more than a few.
Minor skirmishes need not always be fought.
We think we are right and want to prove it.
But it is not always about being right. Its not always about having the last word.
Doctrine is important but never at the expense of treating our brothers and sisters like dirt. God’s truth will stand even if this skirmish is not engaged by us.
Sometimes no answer is thefts one.
…sometimes no answer is the best one.
I believe part of this actually lies in the arena of spiritual warfare. I suspect that one of the enemy’s favorite tactics in the church is to take two groups of people in the church whose gifts ought to be complementary, and get them to fight because they’re different. And, too often, it works (not that it takes a whole lot of successes to be too often). People to whom we should be “extending the right hand of fellowship…..agreeing that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised” (or other complementary pairings) are instead regarded with suspicion because they don’t do things the way we do.
If the enemy can get us bickering with each other instead of contending with the forces of darkness, a victory has been won!
Worse if he gets us bickering with each other because we think we are thereby contending with the forces of darkness, because that will make us even more stubborn in it.
I think the one who thinks they are always right will have imaginary forces to contend with at all times. They proclaim they are on God’s side, and their fundamentalism will not allow them to see the truth. I will give an example, “religion and politics.” Many here on Voices will not look at the big picture and see the truth. In my opinion this will end up destroying the church. It is already taking it’s toll on the church by turning many against her.
There are many other issues we are divided on as well. I pray we can see the big picture and look at what unites us. What unites us is the important thing, not trying to get others to see things the way we do.
I’ve noticed here on Voices, that even when it comes to the SBC president, there is always a name published to vote for. Is this not politics? Sometimes, I’m ashamed of comments made here on Voices. I also include myself. I think it is destroying the church. It’s fundamentalism pure and simple.
Jess, you might find it helpful to examine your own heart rather than just pointing the finger.
Dave,
Thank you for proving my point. You have just went against your own post.
I included myself into the group if you read my comment.
Jess, I see your point, now. Sorry. After the opening sentences which were railing, it seemed, against others, I stopped reading and didn’t see your comment at the end.
Jess,
Your post is quite confusing to me.
What has someone putting forth a name for SBC president have to do with “destroying the church”?
And what church will be destroyed by these few people on Voices not seeing the big picture?
Not my church.
Not my Lord’s church!
Your church? If so, why?
Whose church?
People usually give their opinion when they think they are right. If they thought they were wrong, they would change their opinion.
So would you please explain yourself so I can understand what you are saying? You know, like say it in a different way and add more detail.
Thanks,
mike
Mike,
I think we are getting away from following God and have a desire to follow people. This is what I mean by politics in the church. When we follow people the church is automatically destroyed. We have committees in our churches, yours probably has them too, we follow committee recommendations without consulting the Lord for ourselves. We follow committee recommendations as to who we should elect as pastor, and so on. Seeking the Lord’s will is no longer for the average church member. Today’s typical church is divided up by clergy and laity.
Mike, it’s your church too.
I also want to point out that the world calls us nut cases, crazies, radicals, fruit cakes, and these are only the nice names. Just look at Voices how involved we get with politics, especially for the President of the United States. If you’re not Republican you’re a nothing. This is destroying the congregations in the United States. I’m afraid we are only carrying the name of a church but in reality we are the farthest thing from a church.
When we try to legislate righteousness we have missed the mark. There has to be righteousness in the heart. This is why we must spread the gospel of Christ, and not dictate to others how to live their lives. Unless Christ changes one’s heart there will be no change.
Personally, I have suffered for the gospel of Christ, and will suffer again. But when I do suffer for Christ, I want it to be for Christ by following him and not man.
I promise you we have all missed the mark. I just pray we will get back on track.
Mike,
Also only in America can you find so many conservatives claiming to love their church and country while hating almost every one in them.
The gospel has to be spread to the people, not politics or any other views that originated from man. We are supposed to be separated from the world.
I am not supporting sin in any way, I am saying God’s love can hide a multitude of sins.
Jess,
Which is it, is your beef with conservatives or with Christians?
Not every one claiming o be a Christian is one. And if they are hating everyone, you can know that they are not the Lord’s.
Here’s what I get from your posts: You dislike conservatives politics and don’t like Christians engaging in it.
But I see hate on both sides. Democrats hide it better, thats all. If it bothers you so much, politics that is, just stay out of it. God, don’t you know, is in control.
Let’s just leave politics out of this one. Okay? Not everything is about politics – there are much more important things. Let’s set tgat aside for now, Jess.
Jess,
When you say “we” do you mean that you and other people you know are following people?
Because otherwise it sounds like a blanket accusation against everyone.
Now you are right, we all miss the mark in some way.
But to simply accuse everyone of missing the mark in a certain way is wrong.
Not every believer in David’s time committed adultery and had their lover’s husband killed.
So it would be wrong to accuse them of adultery and murder.
If you just mean, as Christians, we all still stumble in sin, then you are preaching to the choir, for no one I have read on SBC Voices has said they are not.
As far as the church being destroyed, you are quite mistaken. The church has had as its core from the first, sinners. And yet here it is still today.
As to the church divided into clergy and laity, you are again mistaken. On one level there is no laity, for we are all priest before our God. But if your church, your local church id so divided, then you need to be a messenger of God to them to show them truth.
In my local church, I see no such divide. The clergy serves the people, and the people control the finances, including what we pay the clergy. Surely my local church is not alone in this and that are thousands upon thousands of local churches that operate the same.
Fear is not good brother. Fear in anyone or anything other than a deep and abiding respect for the Lord is unfaithfulness.
Now my church has its nominal members. I don’t know if they are all saved. But if they are not, it is not because our clergy has not preached the Gospel, or the laity has not encouraged them and prayed for them. The Word is preached and we seek to love each other, even though we are imperfect at it.
So its not me, stumbler in sin as I am, nor my imperfect church that is the problem.
As to Voices and politics. Each person has a right to their opinion. You have voiced yours here. And in my opinion, you have done a poor job at promoting non-Republicans. I am neither an R or a D, but one who votes his conscience.
I don’t care for a bunch of political wrangling but I read it sometimes just to be informed. if the majority here are R’s, then so what? It seems like you are making a mountain out of a molehill.
If congregations can be destroyed over such earthy matters, then Jess, they are not built on the Rock.
And if the individuals in those congregations ‘lose’ their way, then their own lives were on shifting sand to begin with.
But I am confident of this one thing: that He who begins a good work will finish it, so there is no need of hand wringing.
Mike,
I am accusing everyone, there is no perfect congregation. I think when we become a big business we as a whole have missed the mark, terribly.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, and so am I. Just because your opinion is different doesn’t make me wrong, nor does it make you wrong.
Mike show me in the scriptures where Christ set up the SBC, and I will apologize to you for me being wrong.
Jess,
Why are you accusing everyone? Is that your calling?
I thought the devil had that job! You are not him so why are seeking to act like him?
Jess, do you know that paragraphs are used to keep thoughts together so as to communicate efficiently?
Your first paragraph seems to be you are accusing every church of being a big business. That is simply not true. Why are you making wild accusations that have no basis in reality?
Yes, its your opinion, but Jess, don’t you know that the Bible gives us guidelines on how to deal with people and their sins? It is plain wrong, Biblically, to simply throw around broad accusations and lump people you have never met under the same stained umbrella.
Do you notice what I am doing here Jess? I am pointing out to you your sin. I am not just accusing you wildly because you are part of a group. But I am giving specifics and showing how your actions [words] are in contradiction to the Word of God.
Since you do not know every congregation, to accuse them of being a big business and missing the mark in that regards wrong.
Sure every congregation is not perfect [they miss the mark] but they know that already. That is not going to change as long as we humans are in the flesh. So instead of being the devil’s mouthpiece, my brother, why don’t you be constructive instead of destructive?
What has the SBC have to do with you accusing every church of becoming a big business? The SBC isn’t a church, its an organization that is and mostly always has been a big business. So what. It serves a lot of churches and it serves a lot of missionaries. And its voluntary, so you do not have to be a part of it if you don’t want. But its not a church.
Jess, you seem to me quite confused about how things are.
Mike,
I suppose the Apostles are wrong to point out sins in the church, too. What you are saying is that no one has that right. Maybe, just maybe, you should look at the word a little more closely.
Jess,
The apostles didn’t issue blanket condemnations across the land like you have done.
Example, Paul was very specific with the Corinthians about their errors. Even then, his goal was to give guidance for Christian growth. Paul did not accuse the Galatian church when he was dealing with the Corinthian church and vice versa.
So let me recap:
The Word tells us how to deal with sin in others: you haven’t followed its path.
The Word gives us examples of the above: you’ve ignored those examples and did it your way. The apostles spoke specifically and gave instructions for growth. You’ve spoken broadly with nothing but condemnation, and general platitudes.
The apostles offered hope because of the church’s relationship with Christ.
You’ve preached destruction of the church because we are all sinners.
Mike,
I’d rather not discuss this with you any more. What Paul wrote to the Corinthians is God’s word, and God’s word is applied to every church to follow. Please keep your paragraphs in order. Again, you are just wanting to argue. Please do it with someone else.
Jess,
Furthermore, the SBC is a tool of God that He uses for His purposes. And when He no longer wants to use the SBC, it will no longer have a godly purpose.
The local church is a part of His Body, only as the people in it are part of His Body.. But individual local churches can certainly disappear because they haven’t adhered to the Word. Across time and space we see that many have. But dealing with their problems is a specific task oriented method, usually best done within that church, not a blanket statement by some guy [like you in this case] who knows nothing about their specific needs.
The apostles loved and cared for their churches because they loved and cared for the people and they could do so because they KNEW them. And they set up pastors/elders in the churches to carry on that work, so that those men, who KNEW those people, could aid and guide them in walking in the Spirit.
You are doing the opposite of the apostles.
Mike,
Let me share something with you here. The church is made up of different faces, but always the same problems (SIN). After 37 years of pastoring, I have always found this to be true.
Jess,
Yes, we all sin.
But you have said that our sin will destroy the church.
You accused the churches of being big business.
All of them.
And you said you didn’t want to discuss this anymore and then you did anyhow.
I see no reason to continue this conversation.
Dave,
My intent is not to make your post about elections, but how politics in all it’s forms has infiltrated the church. Sorry for making this sound specifically like elections. I will be more careful.